ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Skeletal Fracture Detection with Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Revolutionizing diagnosis of pulmonaryFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- [Artificial intelligence in traumatological imaging : Evidence, integration into the clinical pathway and limits].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Performance, Heterogeneity, and Methodological Quality of YOLO-Based Models for Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Automated classification of musculoskeletal abnormalities using a dynamic ensemble of deep vision models.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- FAD-MIL: a weakly supervised fracture detection model based on X-ray images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- ResNet based backbone integrated YOLO framework for bone fracture detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bone-CNN: A Lightweight Deep Learning Architecture for Multi-Class Classification of Primary Bone Tumours in Radiographs.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- PEYOLO: a wrist fracture detection network based on multi-level receptive field feature extraction and cross-scale fusion.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Wrist Joint Injury Diagnosis.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
- Deep learning and hybrid architectures for atypical and complex bone fracture diagnosis: a systematic review of performance and clinical validity.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Deep-Fed: A comprehensive solution for precise bone fracture identification in athletes.PloS one · 2026Article
- Treatment decision support for esophageal cancer based on PET/CT data using deep learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Detecting Fifth Metatarsal Fractures on Radiographs Through the Lens of Smartphones: The FIXUS AI Algorithm.Cureus · 2025Article
- Exploring the impact of hyperparameter and data augmentation in YOLO V10 for accurate bone fracture detection from X-ray images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Application in Skull Bone Fracture with Segmentation Approach.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- A YOLO-Based Method for Head Detection in Complex Scenes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Proposal-Free Fully Convolutional Network: Object Detection Based on a Box Map.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Deep Learning Model Based on You Only Look Once Algorithm for Detection and Visualization of Fracture Areas in Three-Dimensional Skeletal Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning models have shown great promise in diagnosing skeletal fractures from X-ray images. However, challenges remain that hinder progress in this field. Firstly, a lack of clear definitions for recognition, classification, detection, and localization tasks hampers the consistent development and comparison of methodologies. The existing reviews often lack technical depth or have limited scope. Additionally, the absence of explainable facilities undermines the clinical application and expert confidence in results. To address these issues, this comprehensive review analyzes and evaluates 40 out of 337 recent papers identified in prestigious databases, including WOS, Scopus, and EI. The objectives of this review are threefold. Firstly, precise definitions are established for the bone fracture recognition, classification, detection, and localization tasks within deep learning. Secondly, each study is summarized based on key aspects such as the bones involved, research objectives, dataset sizes, methods employed, results obtained, and concluding remarks. This process distills the diverse approaches into a generalized processing framework or workflow. Moreover, this review identifies the crucial areas for future research in deep learning models for bone fracture diagnosis. These include enhancing the network interpretability, integrating multimodal clinical information, providing therapeutic schedule recommendations, and developing advanced visualization methods for clinical application. By addressing these challenges, deep learning models can be made more intelligent and specialized in this domain. In conclusion, this review fills the gap in precise task definitions within deep learning for bone fracture diagnosis and provides a comprehensive analysis of the recent research. The findings serve as a foundation for future advancements, enabling improved interpretability, multimodal integration, clinical decision support, and advanced visualization techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.