ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Discrepancies between Radiology Specialists and Residents in Fracture Detection from Musculoskeletal Radiographs.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiocapitellar Alignment in Suspected Pediatric Monteggia Lesions: Narrative Review and Imaging Interpretation Framework.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A large-scale vision foundation model for musculoskeletal radiographs.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of a Teaching Session on Interpreting Common Orthopaedic Radiographs at a Major Trauma Centre.Cureus · 2026Article
- Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of a Novel Classification System for Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A lightweight region of interest-level adjudication framework with hard-negative mining and confidence-aware fusion for pediatric fracture detection.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Comparative accuracy of two commercial AI algorithms for musculoskeletal trauma detection in emergency radiographs.Emergency radiology · 2025Article
- Correction: Huhtanen et al. Discrepancies between Radiology Specialists and Residents in Fracture Detection from Musculoskeletal Radiographs. Diagnostics 2023,Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: The aim of this study was to compare the competence in appendicular trauma radiograph image interpretation between radiology specialists and residents. (2) Methods: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we collected radiology reports from radiology specialists (N = 506) and residents (N = 500) during 2018-2021. As a reference standard, we used the consensus of two subspecialty-level musculoskeletal (MSK) radiologists, who reviewed all original reports. (3) Results: A total of 1006 radiograph reports were reviewed by the two subspecialty-level MSK radiologists. Out of the 1006 radiographs, 41% were abnormal. In total, 67 radiographic findings were missed (6.7%) and 31 findings were overcalled (3.1%) in the original reports. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.86, 0.92, 0.91 and 0.88 respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between radiology specialists' and residents' competence in interpretation (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.