Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37892002›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

TAVI-PREP: A Deep Learning-Based Tool for Automated Measurements Extraction in TAVI Planning.

Marcel Santaló-Corcoy, Denis Corbin, Olivier Tastet, Frédéric Lesage, Thomas Modine, Anita Asgar, Walid Ben Ali

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of fully-automated AI based CT-analysis on pre-procedural TAVI planning.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  2. AMR-VSF: an adaptive memory correction framework for robust 3D CT aorta segmentation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcel Santaló-CorcoyMontreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC H1T 1C8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7925-7789
Denis CorbinMontreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC H1T 1C8, Canada.
Olivier TastetMontreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC H1T 1C8, Canada.
Frédéric LesageMontreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC H1T 1C8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3699-1283
Thomas ModineHôpital Haut Lévêque Bordeaux, 33600 Pessac, France.
Anita AsgarMontreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC H1T 1C8, Canada.
Walid Ben AliMontreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC H1T 1C8, Canada.
Montreal Heart Institute · CAHôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a less invasive alternative to open-heart surgery for treating severe aortic stenosis. Despite its benefits, the risk of procedural complications necessitates careful preoperative planning.

methodsThis study proposes a fully automated deep learning-based method, TAVI-PREP, for pre-TAVI planning, focusing on measurements extracted from computed tomography (CT) scans. The algorithm was trained on the public MM-WHS dataset and a small subset of private data. It uses MeshDeformNet for 3D surface mesh generation and a 3D Residual U-Net for landmark detection. TAVI-PREP is designed to extract 22 different measurements from the aortic valvular complex. A total of 200 CT-scans were analyzed, and automatic measurements were compared to the ones made manually by an expert cardiologist. A second cardiologist analyzed 115 scans to evaluate inter-operator variability.

resultsHigh Pearson correlation coefficients between the expert and the algorithm were obtained for most parameters (0.90-0.97), except for left and right coronary height (0.8 and 0.72, respectively). Similarly, the mean absolute relative error was within 5% for most measurements, except for left and right coronary height (11.6% and 16.5%, respectively). A greater consensus was observed among experts than when compared to the automatic approach, with TAVI-PREP showing no discernable bias towards either the lower or higher ends of the measurement spectrum.

conclusionsTAVI-PREP provides reliable and time-efficient measurements of the aortic valvular complex that could aid clinicians in the preprocedural planning of TAVI procedures.

Indexed as

automatic preoperative planningdeep neural networkstranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

Identifiers

PMID37892002
PMCPMC10606167
OpenAlexW4387573045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.