Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37891849›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

What Is behind In-Stream Advertising on YouTube? A Remote Neuromarketing Study employing Eye-Tracking and Facial Coding techniques.

Marco Mancini, Patrizia Cherubino, Ana Martinez, Alessia Vozzi, Stefano Menicocci, Silvia Ferrara, Andrea Giorgi, Pietro Aricò, Arianna Trettel, Fabio Babiloni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. I DARE: IULM Dataset of Affective Responses.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marco ManciniFaculty of Economics, University of the International Studies of Rome, Via delle Sette Chiese 139, 00147 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8707-5288
Patrizia CherubinoBrainSigns Srl, Via Lungotevere Michelangelo 9, 00192 Rome, Italy.
Ana MartinezBrainSigns Srl, Via Lungotevere Michelangelo 9, 00192 Rome, Italy.
Alessia VozziBrainSigns Srl, Via Lungotevere Michelangelo 9, 00192 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8584-5023
Stefano MenicocciBrainSigns Srl, Via Lungotevere Michelangelo 9, 00192 Rome, Italy.
Silvia FerraraBrainSigns Srl, Via Lungotevere Michelangelo 9, 00192 Rome, Italy.
Andrea GiorgiBrainSigns Srl, Via Lungotevere Michelangelo 9, 00192 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6220-3389
Pietro AricòBrainSigns Srl, Via Lungotevere Michelangelo 9, 00192 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3831-6620
Arianna TrettelBrainSigns Srl, Via Lungotevere Michelangelo 9, 00192 Rome, Italy.
Fabio BabiloniBrainSigns Srl, Via Lungotevere Michelangelo 9, 00192 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4962-176X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Not all elements displayed in a YouTube in-stream video ad are attributable to the ad itself. Some of those are automatically introduced by the platform, such as the countdown timer and the time progress bar. In recent years, some authors started exploring the effects associated with the presence of such non-ad items, providing valuable findings. However, objective evaluation of viewers' visual attention is lacking in this context as well as emotional investigation. In addition, previous research showed how the manipulation of seemingly negligible details can yield dramatically different outcomes in the context of in-stream advertising. To extend knowledge, the authors explored the effects of the non-ad items' presence by employing eye-tracking and facial coding techniques in combination with self-reports in a between-subjects experimental design focusing on the YouTube 15-s, mid-roll, non-skippable in-stream ad format. Results showed that the ad format currently employed by YouTube performs worse than its equivalent without the non-ad items on all the investigated measures and than its equivalent in which the non-ad items' presence was experimentally reduced on facial coding disgust, self-reported disgust, ad irritation, and ad attitude. Managerial insights and challenges concerning the future of in-stream advertising and neuromarketing are highlighted.

Indexed as

disgusteye trackingfacial codingin-stream adsneuromarketingvisual attentionYouTube advertising

Identifiers

PMID37891849
PMCPMC10605368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.