ReviewBrain sciences2023
Pharmacological Therapies of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Narrative Review of Preclinical, Clinical-Experimental, and Real-World Evidence.
Review in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The evolving therapeutic landscape of spinal muscular atrophy - A scoping review of investigational agents, emerging delivery technologies and strategic innovations.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy Carrier Screening: Assessment of Provider Knowledge and Clinical Practice.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- Neurodegenerative spliceosomopathies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Pioneering SMA therapies for all types: survival gains, cost dynamics, and performance-based agreements.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2025Article
- Pilocytic astrocytoma in a child with spinal muscular atrophy treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Article
- Postmarketing adverse events associated with onasemnogene abeparvovec: a real-world pharmacovigilance study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Antisense Oligonucleotides (ASOs) in Motor Neuron Diseases: A Road to Cure in Light and Shade.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Real-World Safety Data of the Orphan Drug Onasemnogene Abeparvovec (ZolgensmaPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Switching from Nusinersen to Risdiplam: A Croatian Real-World Experience on Effectiveness and Safety.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Modeling Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Zebrafish: Current Advances and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare neuromuscular disease, with an estimated incidence of about 1 in 10,000 live births. To date, three orphan drugs have been approved for the treatment of SMA: nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, and risdiplam. The aim of this narrative review was to provide an overview of the pre- and post-marketing evidence on the pharmacological treatments approved for the treatment of SMA by identifying preclinical and clinical studies registered in clinicaltrials.gov and in the EU PAS register from their inception until the 4 January 2023. The preclinical evidence on the drugs approved for SMA allowed a significant acceleration in the experimental phase of these drugs. However, since these drugs had been authorized through accelerated programs, the conduction of post-marketing studies was requested as a condition of their marketing approval to better understand their risk-benefit profiles in real-world settings. As of the 4 January 2023, a total of 69 post-marketing studies concerning the three orphan drugs approved for SMA were identified in clinicaltrials.gov (N = 65; 94.2%) and in the EU PAS register (N = 4; 5.8%). Currently, ongoing studies are primarily aimed at providing evidence concerning the risk-benefit profile of the three drugs in specific populations that were not included in the pivotal trials and to investigate the long-term safety and clinical benefits of these drugs. Real-world data sources collecting information regarding the natural history of the disease and post-marketing surveillance of the available therapies are increasingly becoming essential for generating real-world evidence on this rare disease and its orphan drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.