Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37891814›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2023

Pharmacological Therapies of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Narrative Review of Preclinical, Clinical-Experimental, and Real-World Evidence.

Salvatore Crisafulli, Brigida Boccanegra, Giacomo Vitturi, Gianluca Trifirò, Annamaria De Luca

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neurodegenerative spliceosomopathies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Pilocytic astrocytoma in a child with spinal muscular atrophy treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Salvatore CrisafulliDepartment of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale Ludovico Antonio Scuro 10, 37124 Verona, Italy.
Brigida BoccanegraDepartment of Pharmacy-Drug Sciences, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Via E. Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1078-8490
Giacomo VitturiDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Piazzale Ludovico Antonio Scuro 10, 37124 Verona, Italy.
Gianluca TrifiròDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Piazzale Ludovico Antonio Scuro 10, 37124 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1147-7296
Annamaria De LucaDepartment of Pharmacy-Drug Sciences, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Via E. Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5652-7341
University of Verona · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare neuromuscular disease, with an estimated incidence of about 1 in 10,000 live births. To date, three orphan drugs have been approved for the treatment of SMA: nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, and risdiplam. The aim of this narrative review was to provide an overview of the pre- and post-marketing evidence on the pharmacological treatments approved for the treatment of SMA by identifying preclinical and clinical studies registered in clinicaltrials.gov and in the EU PAS register from their inception until the 4 January 2023. The preclinical evidence on the drugs approved for SMA allowed a significant acceleration in the experimental phase of these drugs. However, since these drugs had been authorized through accelerated programs, the conduction of post-marketing studies was requested as a condition of their marketing approval to better understand their risk-benefit profiles in real-world settings. As of the 4 January 2023, a total of 69 post-marketing studies concerning the three orphan drugs approved for SMA were identified in clinicaltrials.gov (N = 65; 94.2%) and in the EU PAS register (N = 4; 5.8%). Currently, ongoing studies are primarily aimed at providing evidence concerning the risk-benefit profile of the three drugs in specific populations that were not included in the pivotal trials and to investigate the long-term safety and clinical benefits of these drugs. Real-world data sources collecting information regarding the natural history of the disease and post-marketing surveillance of the available therapies are increasingly becoming essential for generating real-world evidence on this rare disease and its orphan drugs.

Indexed as

nusinersenonasemnogene abeparvovecpost-marketing evidencepre-marketing evidencerisdiplamspinal muscular atrophy

Identifiers

PMID37891814
PMCPMC10605203
OpenAlexW4387518240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.