Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37891650›Full record

ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2023

Letrozole-stimulated endometrial preparation protocol is a superior alternative to hormone replacement treatment for frozen embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, a cohort study.

Xiaojuan Wang, Yuan Li, Hongzhuan Tan, Sufen Cai, Shujuan Ma, Yangqin Peng, Hui Guo, Xiaofeng Li, Yi Tang, Shunji Zhang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaojuan Wang *Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Yuan Li *Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-XIANGYA, NO. 567 Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha city, 410008, Hunan Province, China.
Hongzhuan TanDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Sufen CaiClinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-XIANGYA, NO. 567 Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha city, 410008, Hunan Province, China.
Shujuan MaClinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-XIANGYA, NO. 567 Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha city, 410008, Hunan Province, China.
Yangqin PengClinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-XIANGYA, NO. 567 Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha city, 410008, Hunan Province, China.
Hui GuoClinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-XIANGYA, NO. 567 Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha city, 410008, Hunan Province, China.
Xiaofeng LiClinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-XIANGYA, NO. 567 Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha city, 410008, Hunan Province, China.
Yi TangClinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-XIANGYA, NO. 567 Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha city, 410008, Hunan Province, China.
Shunji ZhangClinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-XIANGYA, NO. 567 Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha city, 410008, Hunan Province, China.
Ge LinClinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-XIANGYA, NO. 567 Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha city, 410008, Hunan Province, China.
Fei GongClinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-XIANGYA, NO. 567 Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha city, 410008, Hunan Province, China. gongfei0218@hotmail.com.
Reproductive & Genetic Hospital CITIC-Xiangya · CNCentral South University · CNNational Health and Family Planning Commission · CN

Funding

Hunan Provincial Grant for Innovative Province Construction 2019SK4012Research Grant of CITIC-Xiangya YNXM-202203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current routine endometrial preparation protocol for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is hormone replacement treatment (HRT). Letrozole is rarely used in frozen embryo cycles. Evidence confirming whether letrozole-stimulated (LS) protocol is suitable for frozen embryo transfer in patients with PCOS and for whom is suitable remains lacking.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study involving all frozen embryo transfer cycles with LS and HRT for PCOS during the period from Jan 2019 to December 2020 at a tertiary care center. Multivariate Logistic regression was used to analyze the differences in clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, miscarriage rate, the incidence of other pregnancy and obstetric outcomes between LS and HRT protocols after adjusting for possible confounding factors. Subgroup analysis was used to explore the population for which LS protocol was suitable.

resultsThe results of multivariate logistic regression showed that LS was significantly associated with a higher clinical pregnancy rate (70.9% vs. 64.4%;aOR:1.41, 95%CI: 1.18,1.68), live birth rate (60.5% vs. 51.4% aOR:1.49, 95%CI: 1.27,1.76), and a lower risk of miscarriage (14.7% vs. 20.1% aOR: 0.68, 95%CI: 0.53,0.89), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (6.7% vs. 8.9% aOR: 0.63, 95%CI: 0.42,0.95), and gestational diabetes mellitus (16.7% vs. 20.7% aOR:0.71, 95%CI: 0.53,0.93) than HRT. There were no significant differences in other outcomes such as preterm birth, cesarean delivery, small for gestational age, or large for gestational age between the two endometrial preparation protocols. Subgroup analysis showed that LS had higher live birth rates than HRT in most of the subgroups; in the three subgroups of maternal age ≥ 35 years, menstrual cycle < 35 days, and no insulin resistance, the live birth rates of the two endometrial preparation protocols were comparable.

conclusionsLS protocol could improve the live birth rate and reduce the incidence of miscarriage, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus in patients with PCOS. LS protocol is suitable for all types of patients with PCOS. LS should be considered the preferred endometrial preparation protocol for women with PCOS.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousDiabetes, GestationalHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPolycystic Ovary SyndromePremature BirthAdultCohort StudiesCryopreservationEmbryo TransferFemaleHormonesHumansInfant, NewbornLetrozolePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeHormonesLetrozoleEndometrial preparationFrozen embryo transferHormone replacement treatmentLetrozolePolycystic ovary syndrome

Identifiers

PMID37891650
PMCPMC10605334
OpenAlexW4387974286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.