Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37891632›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2023

"That's why we're speaking up today": exploring barriers to overdose fatality prevention in Indianapolis' Black community with semi-structured interviews.

Dong-Chul Seo, Naomi Satterfield, Leonardo Alba-Lopez, Shin Hyung Lee, Charlotte Crabtree, Nicki Cochran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Perceptions of overdose response hotlines and applications among rural and remote individuals who use drugs in Canada: a qualitative study.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dong-Chul SeoSchool of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, IN, 1025 E 7th St., Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. seo@iu.edu.
Naomi SatterfieldSchool of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, IN, 1025 E 7th St., Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Leonardo Alba-LopezSchool of Education, Indiana University Bloomington, IN, 201 N Rose Ave., Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Shin Hyung LeeSchool of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, IN, 1025 E 7th St., Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Charlotte CrabtreeOverdose Lifeline, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, 1100 W 42Nd St., Suite 385, Indianapolis, IN, 46208, USA.
Nicki CochranOverdose Lifeline, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, 1100 W 42Nd St., Suite 385, Indianapolis, IN, 46208, USA.
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid overdose deaths are of great concern to public health, with over one million lives lost since 1999. While many efforts have been made to mitigate these, Black communities continue to experience a greater burden of fatalities than their white counterparts. This study aims to explore why by working with Black community members in Indianapolis through semi-structured interviews.

methodsSemi-structured one-on-one in-depth interviews were conducted in spring and summer of 2023 with Black residents (N = 23) of zip codes 46202, 46205, 46208, and 46218 in Indianapolis. Ten interview questions were used to facilitate conversations about opioid overdoses, recovery, fatality prevention tools such as calling 911 and naloxone, law enforcement, and racism. Data were analyzed using grounded theory and thematic analysis.

resultsInterviews revealed access barriers and intervention opportunities. Racism was present in both. Mental access barriers such as stigma, fear, and mistrust contributed to practical barriers such as knowledge of how to administer naloxone. Racism exacerbated mental barriers by adding the risk of race-based mistreatment to consequences related to association with substance use. Participants discussed the double stigma of substance use and being Black, fear of being searched in law enforcement encounters and what would happen if law enforcement found naloxone on them, and mistrust of law enforcement and institutions that provide medical intervention. Participants had favorable views of interventions that incorporated mutual aid and discussed ideas for future interventions that included this framework.

conclusionsRacism exacerbates Blacks' mental access barriers (i.e., help-seeking barriers), which, in turn, contribute to practical barriers, such as calling 911 and administering naloxone. Information and resources coming from people within marginalized communities tend to be trusted. Leveraging inter-community relationships may increase engagement in opioid overdose fatality prevention. Interventions and resources directed toward addressing opioid overdose fatalities in Black communities should use mutual aid frameworks to increase the utilization of the tools they provide.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseOpiate OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersSubstance-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsFearFirst respondersHarm reductionMistrustNaloxoneOpioid overdose fatalitiesRacismStigma

Identifiers

PMID37891632
PMCPMC10612233
OpenAlexW4387972262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.