Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37891612›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2023

A transvaginal ultrasound-based diagnostic calculator for uterus post-cesarean scar defect.

Zahra Allameh, Safoura Rouholamin, Sina Rasti, Atoosa Adibi, Zahra Foroughi, Maryam Goharian, Mehrdad Rabiee Rad, Ghazal Ghasempour Dabaghi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zahra AllamehDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Ostad Motahari St., Felezi Bridge, Isfahan, Iran.
Safoura RouholaminDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Ostad Motahari St., Felezi Bridge, Isfahan, Iran.
Sina RastiDepartment of Radiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Atoosa AdibiDepartment of Radiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Zahra ForoughiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Ostad Motahari St., Felezi Bridge, Isfahan, Iran.
Maryam GoharianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Ostad Motahari St., Felezi Bridge, Isfahan, Iran. Mrym.gn72@gmail.com.
Mehrdad Rabiee RadSchool of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Ghazal Ghasempour DabaghiSchool of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA cesarean scar defect (CSD) is incomplete healing of the myometrium at the site of a prior cesarean section (CS), complicating more than half of all cesarean sections. While transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) is the most common modality for diagnosing this defect, hysteroscopy remains the gold standard. We aimed to develop an efficient diagnostic tool for CSD among women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) by integrating TVU findings and participants' demographic features.

methodsA single-center cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 premenopausal and non-pregnant women with a history of CS complaining of AUB without a known systemic or structural etiology. Each participant underwent a hysteroscopy followed by a TVU the next day. The defect dimensions in TVU, patients' age, and the number of previous CSs were integrated into a binary logistic regression model to evaluate their predictive ability for a hysteroscopy-confirmed CSD.

resultsHysteroscopy identified 74 (74%) participants with CSD. The variables age, the number of CSs, defect length, and defect width significantly contributed to the logistic regression model to diagnose CSD with odds ratios of 9.7, 0.7, 2.6, and 1.7, respectively. The developed model exhibited accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 88.00%, 91.89%, and 76.92%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.955 (P-value < 0.001).

conclusionAmong non-pregnant women suspected of CSD due to AUB, looking at age, the number of previous CSs, and TVU-based defect width and length can efficiently rule CSD out.

Indexed as

CicatrixUterine DiseasesCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHysteroscopyPregnancyUterusAbnormal uterine bleedingCesarean scar defectCesarean sectionHysteroscopyTransvaginal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID37891612
PMCPMC10612219
OpenAlexW4387968841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.