Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37891519›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2023

Rehospitalisation rates after long-term follow-up of patients with severe mental illness admitted for more than one year: a systematic review.

Sayaka Sato, Miharu Nakanishi, Makoto Ogawa, Makiko Abe, Naonori Yasuma, Toshiaki Kono, Momoka Igarashi, Mai Iwanaga, Takayuki Kawaguchi, Sosei Yamaguchi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sayaka SatoDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (NCNP), National Institute of Mental Health, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8553, Japan. sayakas@ncnp.go.jp.
Miharu NakanishiDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
Makoto OgawaDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (NCNP), National Institute of Mental Health, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8553, Japan.
Makiko AbeDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (NCNP), National Institute of Mental Health, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8553, Japan.
Naonori YasumaDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (NCNP), National Institute of Mental Health, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8553, Japan.
Toshiaki KonoDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (NCNP), National Institute of Mental Health, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8553, Japan.
Momoka IgarashiDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (NCNP), National Institute of Mental Health, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8553, Japan.
Mai IwanagaDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (NCNP), National Institute of Mental Health, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8553, Japan.
Takayuki KawaguchiDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (NCNP), National Institute of Mental Health, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8553, Japan.
Sosei YamaguchiDepartment of Community Mental Health & Law, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (NCNP), National Institute of Mental Health, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8553, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study aimed to conduct a systematic review of studies on the outcomes of long-term hospitalisation of individuals with severe mental illness, considering readmission rates as the primary outcome.

methodsStudies considered were those in which participants were aged between 18 and 64 years with severe mental illness; exposure to psychiatric hospitals or wards was long-term (more than one year); primary outcomes were readmission rates; secondary outcomes were duration of readmission, employment, schooling, and social participation; and the study design was either observational or interventional with a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. Relevant studies were searched using MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Japan Medical Abstract Society. The final search was conducted on 1 February 2022. The risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions was used to assess the methodological quality. A descriptive literature review is also conducted.

resultsOf the 11,999 studies initially searched, three cohort studies (2,293 participants) met the eligibility criteria. The risk of bias in these studies was rated as critical or serious. The 1-10 years readmission rate for patients with schizophrenia who had been hospitalised for more than one year ranged from 33 to 55%. The average of readmission durations described in the two studies was 70.5 ± 95.6 days per year (in the case of a 7.5-year follow-up) and 306 ± 399 days (in the case of a 3-8-year follow-up). None of the studies reported other outcomes defined in this study.

conclusionsThe readmission rates in the included studies varied. Differences in the follow-up period or the intensity of community services may have contributed to this variability. In countries preparing to implement de-institutionalisation, highly individualised community support should be designed to avoid relocation to residential services under supervision. The length of stay for readmissions was shorter than that for index admissions. The results also imply that discharge to the community contributes to improved clinical outcomes such as improved social functioning. The validity of retaining patients admitted because of the risk of rehospitalisation was considered low. Future research directions have also been discussed.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPatient ReadmissionAdolescentAdultFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansLength of StayMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicYoung AdultAdministrationCommunity mental healthPsychiatric servicesSchizophreniaSystematic reviews

Identifiers

PMID37891519
PMCPMC10612306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.