ArticleBMC public health2023
Resting heart rate and the risk of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus among non-diabetic and prediabetic Iranian adults: Tehran lipid and glucose study.
Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between physical function and type 2 diabetes risk in older adults: a longitudinal analysis from the KoGES-Anseong cohort.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- The association between resting heart rate and HbA1c-assessed glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes in Eastern China.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResting heart rate (RHR) has been found to be a potential risk factor for developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with a highly significant heterogeneity among previous studies. Therefore, we examined the association of RHR and risk of incident T2DM among non-diabetic and prediabetic adults.
methodsThe study population included 2431 men and 2910 women aged ≥ 20 years without T2DM at baseline (2001-2005). Participants were followed for incident T2DM by about 3-year intervals up to April 2018. The multivariable Cox proportional models were applied to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The models were adjusted for age, body mass index, waist circumference, educational level, physical activity, smoking, hypertension, family history of diabetes, triglycerides/ high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, and fasting plasma glucose.
resultsDuring a median follow-up of 12.2 years, 313 men and 375 women developed T2DM. Interestingly, a significant sex-difference was found (all P-values for sex interaction < 0.025). Among men, compared to the first quintile (< 68 bpm: beats per minute), those who had RHR of over 84 bpm were at higher T2DM risk with a HR (95%CI) of 1.69 (1.16-2.47). Furthermore, considering RHR as a continuous variable, an increase of 10 bpm caused 17% significantly higher risk among men with a HR of 1.17 (1.05-1.30). However, among women, there was no significant association between incident T2DM and RHR. Moreover, among prediabetic participants at baseline, the association of RHR and risk of T2DM progression was generally similar to the general population, which means higher RHR increased the risk of T2DM development only among men with a HR of 1.26 (1.09-1.46) for 10 bpm increase.
conclusionsAmong men, being either non-diabetic or prediabetic at baseline, higher RHR can be associated with incident T2DM; however, women didn't show a significant association. Further studies are needed to determine the added value of RHR as a potential modifiable risk factor in screening and risk prediction of incident T2DM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.