ArticleThe AAPS journal2023
Interspecies Scaling of Transgene Products for Viral Vector Gene Therapies: Method Assessment Using Data from Eleven Viral Vectors.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding Nonlinearities in AAV-Based Gene Therapy Using PBPK Modelling.The AAPS journal · 2026Article
- Hybrid Systems Modeling of Donor T-Cell Responses and Graft-Versus-Host-Disease After Posttransplantation Cyclophosphamide Administration.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prediction of transgene product expression in human is important to guide first-in-human (FIH) dose selection for viral vector-based gene replacement therapies. Recently, allometric scaling from preclinical data and interspecies normalization of dose-response (D-R) relationship have been used to predict human transgene product expression of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors. In this study, we assessed two interspecies allometric scaling methods and two dose-response methods in predicting human transgene product expression of nine intravenously administered AAV vectors, one intramuscularly administered AAV vector, and one intravesical administered adenoviral vector. Among the four methods, normalized D-R method generated the highest prediction accuracy, with geometric mean fold error (GMFE) of 2.9 folds and 75% predictions within fivefold deviations of observed human transgene product levels. The vg/kg-based D-R method worked well for locally delivered vectors but substantially overpredicted human transgene product levels of some hemophilia A and B vectors. For both intravenously and locally administered vectors, the prediction accuracy of allometric scaling using body weight
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.