ReviewAnnals of nuclear medicine2024
Current status and perspectives of nuclear cardiology.
Review in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interpretation of myocardial FDG uptake during corticosteroid therapy in cardiac sarcoidosis evaluation withAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The neuronal imaging in cardiology: 123I-Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Advances in imaging-based diagnosis, prognosis, and response assessment in cardiac amyloidosis: a comprehensive multimodality review.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Dynamic Tracking ofMolecular pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Biodistribution, Safety Profile, and Radiation Dosimetry of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Cardiovascular imaging in cardio-oncology.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nuclear cardiology has long been used to identify myocardial ischemia for appropriate treatment strategies for stable coronary artery disease (CAD). After the Ischemia Trial, it is time to reevaluate the significance of ischemia assessment. Functional imaging continues to play pivotal role in detecting microcirculatory disturbances. PET provides a clear image of blood flow distribution and is useful for the quantitative evaluation of myocardial flow reserve (MFR), which plays an important role in predicting treatment strategies and improving prognosis in CAD. Heart failure has become a major area of focus in cardiovascular medicine. Radionuclide imaging has been widely applied in this field. FDG PET is useful in identifying cardiac sarcoidosis and active inflammation. Clinical values of I-123 MIBG and BMIPP SPECT have been reported worldwide from Japan. Additionally, clinical experiences of Tc-99m pyrophosphate imaging have recently gained attention for assessing cardiac amyloidosis. Cardiac PET/CT and PET/MR imaging permit combined assessment of metabolic/functional/structural analyses of various cardiac diseases. While other non-invasive imaging modalities have rapidly been developed, the roles of radionuclide imaging remain to be valuable for early and accurate diagnosis and patient management in most cases of chronic CAD and various cardiovascular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.