ArticleScientific reports2023
A bidirectional Mendelian randomisation study to evaluate the relationship between body constitution and hearing loss.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lower bioelectrical phase angle is associated with audiometric hearing loss in middle-aged and older adults.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Association of hearing loss with cardiovascular and mortality risk in the general population.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Phenome-Wide Comorbidity Atlas of Age-Related Hearing Loss, Speech-in-Noise Deficits, and Tinnitus: Distinguishing Causal Signals from Correlation.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025Article
- Correlation betweenArchives of medical science : AMS · 2025Article
- A causal association between obesity and constipation: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hearing loss and hearing disorders represent possible mediating pathways in the associations between noise exposures and non-auditory health outcomes. In this context, we assessed whether the noise-obesity associations should consider hearing functions as possible mediators and applied Mendelian randomisation (MR) to investigate causal relationships between body constitution and hearing impairments. We obtained genetic associations from publicly available summary statistics from genome-wide association studies in European ancestry adult populations (N= from 210,088 to 360,564) for (i) body constitution: body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and body fat percentage (BFP), and (ii) hearing loss: sensorineural hearing loss, noise-induced hearing loss, and age-related hearing impairment (ARHI). We employed colocalisation analysis to investigate the genetic associations for BMI and ARHI liability within an FTO locus. We conducted bi-directional MR for the 'forward' (from body constitution to hearing) and 'reverse' directions. We applied the random effects inverse variance-weighted method as the main MR method, with additional sensitivity analyses. Colocalisation analysis suggested that BMI and ARHI shared a causal variant at the FTO gene. We did not find robust evidence for causal associations from body constitution to hearing loss and suggested that some associations may be driven by FTO variants. In the reverse analyses, ARHI was negatively associated with BMI [effect size - 0.22 (95% CI - 0.44 to - 0.01)] and BFP [effect size - 0.23 (95% CI - 0.45 to 0.00)], supporting the notion that ARHI may diminish body constitution. Finally, our data suggest that there is no strong evidence that hearing explains the association between noise exposure and body constitution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.