ArticleAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2024
Rheuma-VOR study: optimising healthcare of rheumatic diseases by multiprofessional coordinating centres.
Article in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing disease activity in inflammatory arthritis using optical spectral transmission: a systematic review compared to joint ultrasound, MRI, and clinical activity markers.BMC rheumatology · 2026Pooled it
- [Rheuma in motion-A positioning of exercise and movement therapy in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2025Pooled it
- [Survey of care situation for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis with pulmonary involvement in Rhineland-Palatinate and Saarland].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2026Article
- [Rheuma-VOR-Health economic evaluation of early rheumatological diagnosis : Summary of the G-BA report].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2026Article
- Subclinical inflammation and early pathogenesis of rheumatic diseases: mechanistic insights relevant to primary care.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Review
- Correspondence on "Open-access clinic for arthralgia: patient flow and diagnostic pathways-a retrospective cohort study" by "Nielsen et al."EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- [Consequences of late access to specialist care-effect on medication costs in rheumatoid arthritis].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2026Article
- Interrelations of disease activity, health-related quality of life, and mental health in axial spondyloarthritis: the Rheuma-VOR cohort.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics of chronic sclerosing sialadenitis as a distinctive entity from primary Sjögren's syndrome.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2024Article
- [The subanalysis of Rheuma-VOR demonstrates a considerable need for rheumatological care].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesEarly diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis is critical to prevent joint damage and functional incapacities. However, the discrepancy between recommendations of early diagnosis and reality is remarkable. The Rheuma-VOR study aimed to improve the time to diagnosis of patients with early arthritis by coordinating cooperation between primary care physicians, specialists and patients in Germany.
methodsThis prospective non-randomised multicentre study involved 2340 primary care physicians, 72 rheumatologists, 4 university hospitals and 4 rheumatology centres in 4 German Federal States. The two coprimary endpoints (time to diagnosis and screening performance of primary care physicians) were evaluated for early versus late implementation phase. Additionally, time to diagnosis and secondary endpoints (decrease of disease activity, increase in quality of life and overall well-being, improvement of fatigue, depression, functional ability, and work ability, reduction in drug and medical costs and hospitalisation) were compared with a reference cohort of the German Rheumatism Research Centre (DRFZ) reflecting standard care.
resultsA total of 7049 patients were enrolled in the coordination centres and 1537 patients were diagnosed with a rheumatic disease and consented to further participation. A follow-up consultation after 1 year was realised in 592 patients. The time to diagnosis endpoint and the secondary endpoints were met. In addition, the calculation of cost-effectiveness shows that Rheuma-VOR has a dominant cost-benefit ratio compared with standard care. DISCUSSION: Rheuma-VOR has shown an improvement in rheumatological care, patient-reported outcome parameters and cost savings by coordinating the cooperation of primary care physicians, rheumatologists and patients, in a nationwide approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.