Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37890888›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2023

FGF/FGFR genomic amplification as a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint blockade resistance: a short report.

Nicolas Roussot, Julie Lecuelle, Lorraine Dalens, Caroline Truntzer, Francois Ghiringhelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolas RoussotCancer Biology Transfer Platform, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France nroussot@cgfl.fr fghiringhelli@cgfl.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-6562-6827
Julie LecuelleCancer Biology Transfer Platform, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3181-9126
Lorraine DalensDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France.
Caroline TruntzerCancer Biology Transfer Platform, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0895-4813
Francois GhiringhelliCancer Biology Transfer Platform, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France nroussot@cgfl.fr fghiringhelli@cgfl.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-5465-8305
Inserm · FRCentre Georges François Leclerc · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel crosstalk between immunogenic and oncometabolic pathways triggered by T cell-released interferon-gamma (IFN-ɣ) has been recently identified. This IFN-ɣ-pyruvate kinase M2-β-catenin axis relies on fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) signaling in tumor cells and leads to hyperprogressive disease on immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in preclinical models. This result underlines how IFN-ɣ signaling may have distinct effects on tumor cells depending on their oncogenic and metabolic features. On the basis of these data, this study aims to explore the relationship between genomic tumor FGF2 or FGF/FGF receptor (FGFR) amplification and immunotherapy response in patients with metastatic solid cancers. We used a large genomic data set of 545 ICB-treated patients and compared outcomes between those with and without FGF2 genomic amplification. Patients with no FGF2 genomic amplification had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.55 (95% CI 0.4, 0.8); p value=0.005) and overall survival (OS) (HR=0.56 (0.3, 0.9); p value=0.02) than patients harboring an FGF2 amplification. We next questioned whether such an observation may extend to genomic amplification of the FGF/FGFR pathway. Similarly, patients with no FGF/FGFR genomic amplification had longer PFS (HR=0.71 (0.8, 0.9), p value=0.004) and OS (HR=0.77 (0.6, 1); p value=0.06). RNA sequencing analysis of tumors between the amplified and non-amplified populations showed distinct expression profiles concerning oncogenic pathways. Importantly, using a cohort of patients untreated with ICB from the The Cancer Genome Atlas, we show that FGF2 and FGF/FGFR genomic amplification were not associated with prognosis, thus demonstrating that we identified a predictive biomarker of immunotherapy resistance.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsReceptors, Fibroblast Growth FactorBiomarkers, TumorFibroblast Growth Factor 2GenomicsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsBiomarkers, TumorFibroblast Growth Factor 2Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsReceptors, Fibroblast Growth FactorBiomarkers, TumorImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyMetabolic Networks and PathwaysTumor Biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID37890888
PMCPMC10618988
OpenAlexW4387978564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.