ArticleEnvironmental research2024
Weekly prenatal PM
Article in Environmental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Joint Mixture Associations of Prenatal Air Pollution and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Intake on Birth Weight Outcomes in an African American Cohort.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- The impact of improved air quality on low birth weight and health inequalities in Spain from 2010 to 2018.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Linking mixtures of air pollution exposures and preterm birth with a self-organizing map.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026Article
- Beyond Black and White: relationships between segregation, environmental burden, and birth outcomes among Black and Latino populations.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- BMI-for-age Z-score trajectories in early childhood: a comparison of GMM and KML and associated antenatal and postnatal factors.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Article
- Gestational fine particulate matter exposure and perinatal outcomes in the ECHO cohort: Associations across pregnancy windows.Environmental research · 2026Article
- Prenatal greenness, air pollution, and birthweight: Assessing sensitive windows of exposure and sub-populations in a multi-exposure setting.Environment international · 2026Article
- Maternal SOFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Broad Applications of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Model in Public Health: A Comprehensive Review.GeoHealth · 2025Review
- Prenatal exposure to residential greenness, fetal growth, and birth outcomes: a cohort study in New York City.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- The association of low-level air pollution with birth weight in a register-based study: potential effects below WHO AQ guidelines.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have observed associations between birth weight and prenatal air pollution exposure, but there is not consensus on timing of critical windows of susceptibility.
objectiveWe estimated the difference in birth weight among preterm, early term and full term births associated with weekly exposure to PM
methodsWe included all singleton live births in the Lower Peninsula of Michigan (United States) between 2007 and 2012 occurring at or after 32 weeks gestational age (n = 497,897). Weekly ambient PM
resultsIn single-pollutant models, a 5 μg/m
conclusionWe observed the largest and most persistent adverse associations between PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.