ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2023
Multipole Expansion of Atomic Electron Density Fluctuation Interactions in the Density-Functional Tight-Binding Method.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DSKO: Dancing through DFTB Parametrization.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Recent Developments in DFTB+, a Software Package for Efficient Atomistic Quantum Mechanical Simulations.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accuracy of the density-functional tight-binding (DFTB) method in describing noncovalent interactions is limited due to its reliance on monopole-based spherical charge densities. In this study, we present a multipole-extended second-order DFTB (mDFTB2) method that takes into account atomic dipole and quadrupole interactions. Furthermore, we combine the multipole expansion with the monopole-based third-order contribution, resulting in the mDFTB3 method. To assess the accuracy of mDFTB2 and mDFTB3, we evaluate their performance in describing noncovalent interactions, proton transfer barriers, and dipole moments. Our benchmark results show promising improvements even when using the existing electronic parameters optimized for the original DFTB3 model. Both mDFTB2 and mDFTB3 outperform their monopole-based counterparts, DFTB2 and DFTB3, in terms of accuracy. While mDFTB2 and mDFTB3 perform comparably for neutral and positively charged systems, mDFTB3 exhibits superior performance over mDFTB2 when dealing with negatively charged systems and proton transfers. Overall, the incorporation of the multipole expansion significantly enhances the accuracy of the DFTB method in describing noncovalent interactions and proton transfers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.