Trial reportGynecologic oncology2023
Niraparib and dostarlimab for the treatment of recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: results of a Phase II study (MOONSTONE/GOG-3032).
Trial report in Gynecologic oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy for platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory recurrent ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Drug resistance biomarkers in ovarian cancer: a bibliometric study from 2017 to 2022.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Niraparib, Dostarlimab, and Bevacizumab as Combination Therapy in Pretreated, Advanced Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: Findings From Cohort A of the OPAL Phase II Trial.JCO precision oncology · 2024Trial
- Niraparib in breast cancer: evidence-based perspective on translational progress.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Review
- Overcoming immune resistance in ovarian cancer: checkpoint inhibitors, tumor microenvironment, and translational advances.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Safety and efficacy of Cisplatin in combination with Sintilimab and Niraparib in patients with advanced solid tumors: A phase Ib study.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2026Article
- Enhancing PARP inhibitor efficacy in ovarian cancer: targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Review
- The diversity of CD8Nature reviews. Immunology · 2025Review
- Synthetic Lethality-Based Targets and Their Exploration in Tumour Combination Strategies.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Myeloid targeting antibodies PY159 and PY314 for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- Application of PARP inhibitors combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in ovarian cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Review
- Opportunities for predictive proteogenomic biomarkers of drug treatment sensitivity in epithelial ovarian cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 17 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study assessed the efficacy, safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the treatment regimen of dostarlimab, a programmed death-1 inhibitor, combined with niraparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, in patients with BRCA wild type (BRCAwt) recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) who had previously received bevacizumab treatment.
methodsThis Phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study, conducted in the USA, enrolled patients with recurrent PROC to receive niraparib and dostarlimab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (up to 3 years). A preplanned interim futility analysis was performed after the first 41 patients had undergone ≥1 radiographic evaluation (approximately 9 weeks from the first treatment).
resultsThe prespecified interim futility criterion was met and the study was therefore terminated. For the 41 patients assessed, the objective response rate (ORR) was 7.3% (95% confidence interval: 1.5-19.9); no patients achieved a complete response, 3 patients (7.3%) achieved a partial response (duration of response; 3.0, 3.8, and 9.2 months, respectively), and 9 patients (22.0%) had stable disease. In total, 39 patients (95.1%) experienced a treatment-related adverse event, but no new safety issues were observed. HRQoL, assessed using FOSI, or Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Ovarian Symptom Index scores, worsened over time compared with baseline scores.
conclusionsThe study was terminated due to the observed ORR at the interim futility analysis. This highlights a need for effective therapies in treating patients with recurrent BRCAwt PROC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.