ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics2024
Concurrent impact of de novo mutations on cranial and cortical development in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurocognitive outcomes in children with craniosynostosis after surgical correction: a narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Non-syndromic craniosynostosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025Review
- Reassessing the association: Evaluation of a polyalanine deletion variant of RUNX2 in non-syndromic sagittal and metopic craniosynostosis.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveNonsyndromic craniosynostosis (nsCS), characterized by premature cranial suture fusion, is considered a primary skull disorder in which impact on neurodevelopment, if present, results from the mechanical hindrance of brain growth. Despite surgical repair of the cranial defect, neurocognitive deficits persist in nearly half of affected children. Therefore, the authors performed a functional genomics analysis of nsCS to determine when, where, and in what cell types nsCS-associated genes converge during development.
methodsThe authors integrated whole-exome sequencing data from 291 nsCS proband-parent trios with 29,803 single-cell transcriptomes of the prenatal and postnatal neurocranial complex to inform when, where, and in what cell types nsCS-mutated genes might exert their pathophysiological effects.
resultsThe authors found that nsCS-mutated genes converged in cranial osteoprogenitors and pial fibroblasts and their transcriptional networks that regulate both skull ossification and cerebral neurogenesis. Nonsyndromic CS-mutated genes also converged in inhibitory neurons and gene coexpression modules that overlapped with autism and other developmental disorders. Ligand-receptor cell-cell communication analysis uncovered crosstalk between suture osteoblasts and neurons via the nsCS-associated BMP, FGF, and noncanonical WNT signaling pathways.
conclusionsThese data implicate a concurrent impact of nsCS-associated de novo mutations on cranial morphogenesis and cortical development via cell- and non-cell-autonomous mechanisms in a developmental nexus of fetal osteoblasts, pial fibroblasts, and neurons. These results suggest that neurodevelopmental outcomes in nsCS patients may be driven more by mutational status than surgical technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.