Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37889905›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2023

A standardised differential privacy framework for epidemiological modeling with mobile phone data.

Merveille Koissi Savi, Akash Yadav, Wanrong Zhang, Navin Vembar, Andrew Schroeder, Satchit Balsari, Caroline O Buckee, Salil Vadhan, Nishant Kishore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Merveille Koissi SaviDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7691-0495
Akash YadavDirect Relief, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Wanrong ZhangDepartment of Computer Sciences, Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering & Applied Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Navin VembarCamber Systems, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Andrew SchroederDirect Relief, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Satchit BalsariDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Caroline O BuckeeDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Salil VadhanDepartment of Computer Sciences, Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering & Applied Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Nishant KishoreDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0408-2747
Harvard University · USDirect Relief · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of mobile phone data for monitoring human mobility patterns has become increasingly common, both to study the impact of travel restrictions on population movement and epidemiological modeling. Despite the importance of these data, the use of location information to guide public policy can raise issues of privacy and ethical use. Studies have shown that simple aggregation does not protect the privacy of an individual, and there are no universal standards for aggregation that guarantee anonymity. Newer methods, such as differential privacy, can provide statistically verifiable protection against identifiability but have been largely untested as inputs for compartment models used in infectious disease epidemiology. Our study examines the application of differential privacy as an anonymisation tool in epidemiological models, studying the impact of adding quantifiable statistical noise to mobile phone-based location data on the bias of ten common epidemiological metrics. We find that many epidemiological metrics are preserved and remain close to their non-private values when the true noise state is less than 20, in a count transition matrix, which corresponds to a privacy-less parameter ϵ = 0.05 per release. We show that differential privacy offers a robust approach to preserving individual privacy in mobility data while providing useful population-level insights for public health. Importantly, we have built a modular software pipeline to facilitate the replication and expansion of our framework.

Identifiers

PMID37889905
PMCPMC10610440
OpenAlexW4387996145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.