Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37889889›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2024

Antiseizure medication ≤48 hours portends better prognosis in new-onset epilepsy.

Eric Ménétré, Pia De Stefano, Pierre Megevand, François P Sarasin, Maria I Vargas, Andreas Kleinschmidt, Serge Vulliemoz, Fabienne Picard, Margitta Seeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eric MénétréEEG & Epilepsy Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1101-1288
Pia De StefanoEEG & Epilepsy Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7979-0994
Pierre MegevandEEG & Epilepsy Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
François P SarasinDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Maria I VargasNeuroradiology Department, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Andreas KleinschmidtEEG & Epilepsy Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Serge VulliemozEEG & Epilepsy Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Fabienne PicardEEG & Epilepsy Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Margitta SeeckEEG & Epilepsy Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 163398Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 169198Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung CRSII5_170873Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung CRSIIS_180365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies found that patients with new-onset epilepsy (NOE) have higher seizure recurrence rates if they presented already prior seizures. These observations suggest that timing of antiseizure medication (ASM) is crucial and should be offered immediately after the first seizure. Here, we wanted to assess whether immediate ASM is associated with improved outcome.

methodsSingle-center study of 1010 patients (≥16 years) who presented with a possible first seizure in the emergency department between 1 March 2010 and 1 March 2017. A comprehensive workup was launched upon arrival, including routine electroencephalography (EEG), brain computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, long-term overnight EEG and specialized consultations. We followed patients for 5 years comparing the relapse rate in patients treated within 48 h to those with treatment >48 h.

resultsA total of 487 patients were diagnosed with NOE. Of the 416 patients (162 female, age: 54.6 ± 21.1 years) for whom the treatment start could be retrieved, 80% (333/416) were treated within 48 h. The recurrence rate after immediate treatment (32%; 107/333) was significantly lower than in patients treated later (56.6%; 47/83; p < 0.001). For patients for whom a complete 5-year-follow-up was available (N = 297, 123 female), those treated ≤48 h (N = 228; 76.8%) had a significantly higher chance of remaining seizure-free compared with patients treated later (N = 69; 23.2%; p < 0.001).

conclusionsIn this retrospective study, immediate ASM therapy (i.e., within 48 h) was associated with better prognosis up to 5 years after the index event. Prospective studies are required to determine the value of immediate workup and drug therapy in NOE patients.

Indexed as

EpilepsyAdultAgedElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSeizuresanti-epileptic drugsantiseizure medicationEEGfirst seizurelong-term EEGMRInew-onset epilepsypsychogenicsleep EEG

Identifiers

PMID37889889
PMCPMC11236038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.