ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2024
Antiseizure medication ≤48 hours portends better prognosis in new-onset epilepsy.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Neurologists' Views on the Management of Uncontrolled Epilepsy in Spain: A Preliminary Survey.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- The Role of Neurologists in the Management of Uncontrolled Epilepsy in Spain: Opportunities for Optimization.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Continuous Versus Short EEG After Ischemic Stroke: What cEEG Adds for Detecting Abnormalities and Predicting Post-Stroke Epilepsy.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Initial Monotherapy and Further Anti-seizure Medication Regimens in Adult Patients with Epilepsy: A Population-Based, Longitudinal, Retrospective Analysis of German Prescription Data.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Clinical efficacy and predictive model development for levetiracetam in children with newly diagnosed epilepsy of unknown etiology.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Real-world utilization of Cenobamate as adjunct therapy in office-based neurology: practical tips and insights for titration.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Presence of interictal epileptiform EEG discharges implies increased risk of recurrence after the first unprovoked seizure: Report of the International League Against Epilepsy and International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2025Review
- Prognostic models for seizures and epilepsy after stroke, tumors and traumatic brain injury.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2025Review
- Neuronal current imaging of epileptic activity: An MRI study in patients with a first unprovoked epileptic seizure.Epilepsia open · 2024Observational
- Antiseizure medication ≤48 hours portends better prognosis in new-onset epilepsy.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeveral studies found that patients with new-onset epilepsy (NOE) have higher seizure recurrence rates if they presented already prior seizures. These observations suggest that timing of antiseizure medication (ASM) is crucial and should be offered immediately after the first seizure. Here, we wanted to assess whether immediate ASM is associated with improved outcome.
methodsSingle-center study of 1010 patients (≥16 years) who presented with a possible first seizure in the emergency department between 1 March 2010 and 1 March 2017. A comprehensive workup was launched upon arrival, including routine electroencephalography (EEG), brain computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, long-term overnight EEG and specialized consultations. We followed patients for 5 years comparing the relapse rate in patients treated within 48 h to those with treatment >48 h.
resultsA total of 487 patients were diagnosed with NOE. Of the 416 patients (162 female, age: 54.6 ± 21.1 years) for whom the treatment start could be retrieved, 80% (333/416) were treated within 48 h. The recurrence rate after immediate treatment (32%; 107/333) was significantly lower than in patients treated later (56.6%; 47/83; p < 0.001). For patients for whom a complete 5-year-follow-up was available (N = 297, 123 female), those treated ≤48 h (N = 228; 76.8%) had a significantly higher chance of remaining seizure-free compared with patients treated later (N = 69; 23.2%; p < 0.001).
conclusionsIn this retrospective study, immediate ASM therapy (i.e., within 48 h) was associated with better prognosis up to 5 years after the index event. Prospective studies are required to determine the value of immediate workup and drug therapy in NOE patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.