Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37889878›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

The impact of COVID-19 on health financing in Kenya.

Angela Kairu, Stacey Orangi, Boniface Mbuthia, Brian Arwah, Fatuma Guleid, Janet Keru, Ileana Vilcu, Anne Musuva, Nirmala Ravishankar, Edwine Barasa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Angela KairuHealth Economics Research Unit (HERU), KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Program, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0965-4460
Stacey OrangiHealth Economics Research Unit (HERU), KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Program, Nairobi, Kenya.
Boniface MbuthiaThinkWell Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Brian ArwahHealth Economics Research Unit (HERU), KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Program, Nairobi, Kenya.
Fatuma GuleidHealth Economics Research Unit (HERU), KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Program, Nairobi, Kenya.
Janet KeruThinkWell Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6846-4862
Ileana VilcuThinkWell, Regus, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anne MusuvaThinkWell Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nirmala RavishankarThinkwell, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Edwine BarasaHealth Economics Research Unit (HERU), KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Program, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden shocks to health systems, such as the COVID-19 pandemic may disrupt health system functions. Health system functions may also influence the health system's ability to deliver in the face of sudden shocks such as the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined the impact of COVID-19 on the health financing function in Kenya, and how specific health financing arrangements influenced the health systems capacity to deliver services during the COVID-19 pandemic.We conducted a cross-sectional study in three purposively selected counties in Kenya using a qualitative approach. We collected data using in-depth interviews (n = 56) and relevant document reviews. We interviewed national level health financing stakeholders, county department of health managers, health facility managers and COVID-19 healthcare workers. We analysed data using a framework approach. Purchasing arrangements: COVID-19 services were partially subsidized by the national government, exposing individuals to out-of-pocket costs given the high costs of these services. The National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) adapted its enhanced scheme's benefit package targeting formal sector groups to include COVID-19 services but did not make any adaptations to its general scheme targeting the less well-off in society. This had potential equity implications. Public Finance Management (PFM) systems: Nationally, PFM processes were adaptable and partly flexible allowing shorter timelines for budget and procurement processes. At county level, PFM systems were partially flexible with some resource reallocation but maintained centralized purchasing arrangements. The flow of funds to counties and health facilities was delayed and the procurement processes were lengthy. Reproductive and child health services: Domestic and donor funds were reallocated towards the pandemic response resulting in postponement of program activities and affected family planning service delivery. Universal Health Coverage (UHC) plans: Prioritization of UHC related activities was negatively impacted due the shift of focus to the pandemic response. Contrarily the strategic investments in the health sector were found to be a beneficial approach in strengthening the health system. Strengthening health systems to improve their resilience to cope with public health emergencies requires substantial investment of financial and non-financial resources. Health financing arrangements are integral in determining the extent of adaptability, flexibility, and responsiveness of health system to COVID-19 and future pandemics.

Identifiers

PMID37889878
PMCPMC10610457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.