Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37889483›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2023

Use of Telemedicine and Quality of Care Among Medicare Enrollees With Serious Mental Illness.

Andrew D Wilcock, Haiden A Huskamp, Alisa B Busch, Sharon-Lise T Normand, Lori Uscher-Pines, Pushpa V Raja, Jose R Zubizarreta, Michael L Barnett, Ateev Mehrotra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ethical challenges in contemporary psychiatry: an overview and an appraisal of possible strategies and research needs.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew D WilcockDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Haiden A HuskampDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alisa B BuschDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sharon-Lise T NormandDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lori Uscher-PinesRAND Health, Arlington, Virginia.
Pushpa V RajaDepartment of Mental Health, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
Jose R ZubizarretaDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael L BarnettDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ateev MehrotraDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USMcLean Hospital · USVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System · US

Funding

Use of Telemedicine in the Treatment of Mental IllnessR01MH112829 · NIMH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HUSKAMP, HAIDEN A., MEHROTRA, ATEEV · 2018 to 2025
$5.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a large fraction of mental health care was provided via telemedicine. The implications of this shift in care for use of mental health service and quality of care have not been characterized. Objective: To compare changes in care patterns and quality during the first year of the pandemic among Medicare beneficiaries with serious mental illness (schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder) cared for at practices with higher vs lower telemedicine use. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder were attributed to specialty mental health practices that delivered the majority of their mental health care in 2019. Practices were categorized into 3 groups based on the proportion of telemental health visits provided during the first year of the pandemic (March 2020-February 2021): lowest use (0%-49%), middle use (50%-89%), or highest use (90%-100%). Across the 3 groups of practices, differential changes in patient outcomes were calculated from the year before the pandemic started to the year after. These changes were also compared with differential changes from a 2-year prepandemic period. Analyses were conducted in November 2022. Exposure: Practice-level use of telemedicine during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the total number of mental health visits (telemedicine plus in-person) per person. Secondary outcomes included the number of acute hospital and emergency department encounters, all-cause mortality, and quality outcomes, including adherence to antipsychotic and mood-stabilizing medications (as measured by the number of months of medication fills) and 7- and 30-day outpatient follow-up rates after discharge for a mental health hospitalization. Results: The pandemic cohort included 120 050 Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 56.5 [14.5] years; 66 638 females [55.5%]) with serious mental illness. Compared with prepandemic changes and relative to patients receiving care at practices with the lowest telemedicine use: patients receiving care at practices in the middle and highest telemedicine use groups had 1.11 (95% CI, 0.45-1.76) and 1.94 (95% CI, 1.28-2.59) more mental health visits per patient per year (or 7.5% [95% CI, 3.0%-11.9%] and 13.0% [95% CI, 8.6%-17.4%] more mental health visits per year, respectively). Among patients of practices with middle and highest telemedicine use, changes in adherence to antipsychotic and mood-stabilizing medications were -0.4% (95% CI, -1.3% to 0.5%) and -0.1% (95% CI, -1.0% to 0.8%), and hospital and emergency department use for any reason changed by 2.4% (95% CI, -1.5% to 6.2%) and 2.8% (95% CI, -1.2% to 6.8%), respectively. There were no significant differential changes in postdischarge follow-up or mortality rates according to the level of telemedicine use. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries with serious mental illness, patients receiving care from practices that had a higher level of telemedicine use during the COVID-19 pandemic had more mental health visits per year compared with prepandemic levels, with no differential changes in other observed quality metrics over the same period.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsCOVID-19Mental DisordersTelemedicineAftercareAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMedicareMiddle AgedPandemicsPatient DischargeUnited StatesAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID37889483
PMCPMC10611994
OpenAlexW4387965995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.