Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37889469›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2024

Incorporation of CEUS and SWE parameters into a multivariate logistic regression model for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant TI-RADS 4 thyroid nodules.

Hong-Jing Li, Guo-Qing Sui, Deng-Ke Teng, Yuan-Qiang Lin, Hui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hong-Jing LiDepartment of Ultrasound, China-Japan Union Hospital of Ji Lin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Guo-Qing SuiDepartment of Ultrasound, China-Japan Union Hospital of Ji Lin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Deng-Ke TengDepartment of Ultrasound, China-Japan Union Hospital of Ji Lin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Yuan-Qiang Lin *Department of Ultrasound, China-Japan Union Hospital of Ji Lin University, Changchun, Jilin, China. linyuanqiang@jlu.edu.cn.
Hui Wang *Department of Ultrasound, China-Japan Union Hospital of Ji Lin University, Changchun, Jilin, China. whui66@jlu.edu.cn.

Funding

Jilin University 2019SCI027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantitative analysis parameters combined with shear wave elastography (SWE) quantitative parameters in the differentiation of benign and malignant ACR TI-RADS category 4 thyroid nodules and to provide a more effective reference for clinical work.

methodsWe analyzed 187 category 4 nodules, including 132 nodules in the development cohort and 55 nodules in the validation cohort, divided the development cohort into benign and malignant groups, and analyzed the differences in all CEUS and SWE quantitative parameters between the two groups. We selected the highest AUC of the two parameters, performed binary logistic regression analysis with the ACR TI-RADS score and constructed a diagnostic model. ROC curves were applied to evaluate their diagnostic efficacy.

results1) The diagnostic model had an AUC of 0.926, sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 86.8%, diagnostic threshold of 3, accuracy of 87.12%, positive predictive value of 86.15%, and negative predictive value of 88.06%. 2) The diagnostic model had an AUC of 0.890 in the validation cohort, sensitivity of 81.5%, specificity of 79.6%, and accuracy of 80.00%.

conclusionThe combined multiparameter construction of the nodule diagnostic model can effectively improve the diagnostic efficacy of 4 types of thyroid nodules and provide a new reference index for clinical diagnostic work.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesThyroid NoduleDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansLogistic ModelsRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyACR TI-RADSThyroid glandTime–intensity curve (TIC)Ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID37889469
PMCPMC10902020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.