Trial reportIndian journal of pediatrics2024
Efficacy of Teleconsultation-Based Rehabilitation in Children with Landry-Guillain-Barré Syndrome: An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial (Tele Rehab-LGBS Trial).
Trial report in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Telerehabilitation in Acquired Neuromuscular Weakness: Are We Ready to Foster Consensus and Determine Best Practices?Indian journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of teleconsultation-based rehabilitation in children with Landry-Guillain-Barré syndrome (LGBS), measured with Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score and Hughes score.
methodsA pragmatic, prospective, parallel open label randomized controlled trial was conducted among a total of 50 children with LGBS. The children were randomized using computer generated block randomization into 2 groups (25 in each group): Standard of care (Group A) and teleconsultation-based rehabilitation (Group B). Primary and secondary outcomes were measured with MRC sum score and Hughes score at 12- and 24-wk follow-up.
resultsThe mean age was 6.4 ± 3.3 y; 29 (58%) were boys. Baseline MRC sum score (median, IQR), and Hughes score (median, IQR) in group A was 24 (7-31) and 5 (4-5) respectively; and in group B was 18 (9-24) and 4 (4-5) respectively. At discharge, median (IQR) MRC sum score in group A and B was 34 (28-41), and 30 (25-43) (p value = 0.31) respectively. Tele-rehabilitation was provided to group B for 24 wk with 96% compliance. At 12 wk, median MRC sum score in group A and group B were similar [48 (IQR 44-54) vs. 52 (IQR 46-60), p value = 0.08]. At 12 wk and 24 wk, median Hughes score in group A and B were similar. At 24 wk, 15 out of 23 subjects of group A and 18 out of 25 subjects of group B were ambulatory (p value = 0.61).
conclusionsTeleconsultation-based rehabilitation was feasible with a high compliance rate. The functional outcomes measured with MRC sum score and Hughes score were similar in both the groups at 12 and 24 wk follow-up. Teleconsultation-based rehabilitation has similar efficacy as physical rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37889455What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.