Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37889441›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2023

Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable brain tumors.

David Crompton, Daniel Koffler, Fatemeh Fekrmandi, Eric J Lehrer, Jason P Sheehan, Daniel M Trifiletti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diagnosis and management of brain metastasis from thyroid cancer.Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David CromptonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road South, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Daniel KofflerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road South, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Fatemeh FekrmandiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, USA.
Eric J LehrerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Jason P SheehanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
Daniel M TrifilettiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road South, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA. trifiletti.daniel@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic · USNeurological Surgery · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a method of delivering conformal radiation, which allows minimal radiation damage to surrounding healthy tissues. Adjuvant radiation therapy has been shown to improve local control in a variety of intracranial neoplasms, such as brain metastases, gliomas, and benign tumors (i.e., meningioma, vestibular schwannoma, etc.). For brain metastases, adjuvant SRS specifically has demonstrated positive oncologic outcomes as well as preserving cognitive function when compared to conventional whole brain radiation therapy. However, as compared with neoadjuvant SRS, larger post-operative volumes and greater target volume uncertainty may come with an increased risk of local failure and treatment-related complications, such as radiation necrosis. In addition to its role in brain metastases, neoadjuvant SRS for high grade gliomas may enable dose escalation and increase immunogenic effects and serve a purpose in benign tumors for which one cannot achieve a gross total resection (GTR). Finally, although neoadjuvant SRS has historically been delivered with photon therapy, there are high LET radiation modalities such as carbon-ion therapy which may allow radiation damage to tissue and should be further studied if done in the neoadjuvant setting. In this review we discuss the evolving role of neoadjuvant radiosurgery in the treatment for brain metastases, gliomas, and benign etiologies. We also offer perspective on the evolving role of high LET radiation such as carbon-ion therapy.

methodsPubMed was systemically reviewed using the search terms "neoadjuvant radiosurgery", "brain metastasis", and "glioma". ' Clinicaltrials.gov ' was also reviewed to include ongoing phase III trials.

resultsThis comprehensive review describes the evolving role for neoadjuvant SRS in the treatment for brain metastases, gliomas, and benign etiologies. We also discuss the potential role for high LET radiation in this setting such as carbon-ion radiotherapy.

conclusionEarly clinical data is very promising for neoadjuvant SRS in the setting of brain metastases. There are three ongoing phase III trials that will be more definitive in evaluating the potential benefits. While there is less data available for neoadjuvant SRS for gliomas, there remains a potential role, particularly to enable dose escalation and increase immunogenic effects.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaRadiosurgeryCarbonHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesCarbonBrain metastasesGliomaHigh LET RadiationNeoadjuvantRadiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID37889441
OpenAlexW4387965195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.