ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2024
Validation of the prehospital stroke scales as a tool for in-hospital large vessel occlusion stroke: whether we satisfied?
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrehospital stroke severity scales have been widely used to identify whether community stroke patients presented with large vessel occlusion (LVO) or not. However, whether these scales are also applicable to in-hospital stroke patients remains unknown. PURPOSE: We aim to validate and compare the predictive capability of these scales for these patients. MATERIAL AND
methodsFrom January 2016 to October 2020, a total of 243 patients who activated in-hospital stroke alerts, were included in this study. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess the predictive ability of five scales (Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination [FAST-ED], Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation [RACE], Los Angeles Motor Scale [LAMS], Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Severity Scale [CPSSS], and Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity scale [PASS]) for LVO. In addition, multivariable logistic analysis was adopted to determine the predictors of LVO in our patients cohort.
resultsFinally, 94 (38.7%) patients were confirmed presence of persistent LVO. The AUC for the FAST-ED, RACE, LAMS, CPSSS, and PASS scales to predict the presence of LVO in patients activating in-hospital stroke alerts were 0.82, 0.89, 0.86, 0.81, and 0.79, respectively. After multivariable analysis, baseline NIHSS (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.160, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.110-1.212; P < 0.001) atrial fibrillation (adjusted OR = 2.940, 95% CI = 1.387-6.230; P = 0.005) and cardiac/pulmonary procedure (adjusted OR = 6.861, 95% CI = 2.437-19.315; P < 0.001) remained independent predictors of LVO.
conclusionThe prehospital stroke scales also showed good predictive capabilities in discriminating LVO among inpatients who activated stroke alerts. However, given that inpatients' history is more readily available, a specifically designed in-hospital stroke scale that combines stroke severity and history is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.