Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37889397›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025

"Care needs to be integrated" Patient and provider perspectives on a cancer shared-care model.

Shoshana Adler Jaffe, Miria Kano, Stephanie Rieder, Amy C Gundelach, Tawny Boyce, Teresa Rutledge, Zoneddy Dayao, Andrew L Sussman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. "It really takes a village": perspectives on multi-level barriers to endometrial cancer care for rural patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shoshana Adler JaffeUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA. sadlerjaffe@salud.unm.edu.
Miria KanoUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Stephanie RiederUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Amy C GundelachUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Tawny BoyceUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Teresa RutledgeUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Zoneddy DayaoUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Andrew L SussmanUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrent early-stage breast and gynecological cancer care models often begin with a referral from a primary care provider (PCP) or gynecologist (OB/Gyn) and end with a patient being transitioned back to the referring provider at the completion of treatment. There is frequently little communication between oncologists and the referring provider during treatment, and this pattern continues after the patient completes their treatment.

methodsWe convened a diverse Patient Advisory Board (PAB) to identify areas where breast or gynecological cancer patients felt they could benefit from additional support during and after their cancer care. PAB members attended five Zoom meetings and completed four online surveys. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with primary care or OB/Gyn physicians to collect information on current practices.

resultsPatients identified multiple areas in which they needed additional support from their PCP. Providers also identified topics on which they could use additional training. However, there was little overlap between patient and provider priority topics. Both patients and providers agreed that there was inadequate communication between the cancer center and PCPs before, during, and after cancer treatment.

conclusionsA shared-care model that emphasizes communication between primary care providers, the oncology care team, and patients is urgently needed. Patients indicated the need for additional support from their PCP on specific topics, and PCPs were interested in continuing their education to better serve their patients with cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The importance of consistent communication among all parties during the entire cancer journey was emphasized as a key area for improvement.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedGenital Neoplasms, FemaleAdultCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesBreast cancerGynecological cancerPrimary care providersSurvivorship

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.