Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37889309›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Construction of cuproptosis signature based on bioinformatics and experimental validation in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Xi Tian, Shuxuan Zhu, Wangrui Liu, Xinrui Wu, Gaomeng Wei, Ji Zhang, Aihetaimujiang Anwaier, Cong Chen, Shiqi Ye, Xiangxian Che and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xi Tian *Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Shuxuan Zhu *Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Wangrui Liu *Department of Interventional Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, People's Republic of China.
Xinrui Wu *Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, People's Republic of China.
Gaomeng Wei *Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, 533000, People's Republic of China.
Ji ZhangDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Aihetaimujiang AnwaierDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Cong ChenDepartment of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Cente, Shanghai, China.
Shiqi YeDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Xiangxian CheDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Wenhao XuDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China. xwhao0407@163.com.
Yuanyuan QuDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China. quyy1987@163.com.
Hailiang ZhangDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China. zhanghl918@163.com.
Dingwei YeDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China. dwyelie@163.com.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNAffiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities · CNNantong University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2019YFC1316005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCuproptosis was defined as a novel nonapoptotic cell death pathway and its potential function in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains unclear.

methodsWe obtained gene expression profiles, somatic mutation and corresponding clinical information of 881 ccRCC samples from 3 cohorts including the cancer genome atlas cohort, GSE29609 cohort and CheckMate 025 cohort. As described in the latest published article, we enrolled 16 genes as cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs). We explored the expression level, variants and copy number variation of the CRGs. Univariate and multi-variate regression were utilized to assess the prognostic significance of the CRGs. Non-negative matrix factorization was used to identify potential subgroup and gene set variation analysis was used to explore the potential biological functions. CIBERSORT, ESTIMATE algorithm and single sample gene set enrichment analysis were used to evaluate the tumor microenvironment. In vitro experiments including CCK-8, transwell and wound healing assays were utilized to explore the potential biological function of DLAT in ccRCC.

resultsWe found that except for CDKN2A, the CRGs were positively associated with patients' OS. Cuproptosis cluster, cuproptosis gene cluster and cuproptosis score were established, respectively, and higher cuproptosis score was significantly associated with a worse OS in ccRCC (p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the cuproptosis-related nomogram at 1 year, 3 years, 5 years was 0.858, 0.821 and 0.78, respectively. In addition, we found that the cuproptosis score was positively associated with PDCD1, CTLA4 expression level, thus the cuproptosis score may also reflect the dysfunction of tumor infiltrating immune cells. In vitro experiments indicated that overexpression of DLAT could inhibited the migration and proliferation ability of ccRCC cells.

conclusionOur findings identify a novel cuproptosis-related signature and the cuproptosis characteristics may influence the anti-tumor immunity though complex regulating networks, and thus cuproptosis may play a role in developing novel therapeutic target of ccRCC.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCarcinomaCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsComputational BiologyCopperDNA Copy Number VariationsHumansTumor MicroenvironmentCopperBiomarkerClear cell renal cell carcinomaCuproptosisPrognosisTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID37889309
PMCPMC11797599
OpenAlexW4387966358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.