SynthesisEuropean radiology2024
Diagnostic efficacy of posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction: a systematic review of literature.
Synthesis in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between clinical and MRI-detected imaging findings for people with midfoot pain, a cross-sectional study.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo perform a systematic review to examine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and radiography in the evaluation of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD). MATERIALS AND
methodsMedline, Scopus, Embase, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for relevant studies through April 2023. The study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 scoring system.
resultsOf the initial 634 studies, 12 studies met the quality criteria and were included, with 645 PTTs evaluated with MRI, 133 with US, and 97 with radiography. MRI was found to be more sensitive and specific than ultrasound, radiography, and clinical evaluation for detecting PTTD, with a sensitivity of up to 95%, specificity of up to 100%, and accuracy of 96% for detecting PTT tears. US showed a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 90% for diagnosing tendinopathy, and a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 80% for diagnosing peritendinosis when compared to MRI. Weight-bearing radiographs had a sensitivity of 71.4%, specificity of 88.9%, and diagnostic accuracy of 81.3% when diagnosing PTT ruptures. Various radiologic measurements were also found to have a significant relationship with PTT tears but were poorly correlated with PTT tendinosis and isolated tenosynovitis.
conclusionMagnetic resonance imaging is the preferred imaging tool for evaluating patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, with higher diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity compared to ultrasound and radiographic imaging. However, initial imaging with ultrasound and radiographs may be used due to their availability and cost-effectiveness. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: PTTD affects 3% of women ≥ 40 years and 10% of adults ≥ 65 years globally. Using the appropriate imaging study, MRI ensures that patients suffering from PTTD are diagnosed and treated in a timely manner. KEY POINTS: • This review aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of MRI, ultrasonography, and radiography in evaluating PTTD. • MRI outperformed ultrasound and radiography, with higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in detecting PTT tears. • MRI is the preferred imaging modality for the initial diagnosis of PTTD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.