Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37889163›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2024

To what extent do physiological tolerances determine elevational range limits of mammals?

Jay F Storz, Graham R Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jay F StorzSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5448-7924
Graham R ScottDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4225-7475

Funding

Genomic and physiological mechanisms of hypoxia adaptation in high-altitude miceR01HL159061 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI STORZ, JAY · 2022 to 2025
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL159061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key question in biology concerns the extent to which distributional range limits of species are determined by intrinsic limits of physiological tolerance. Here, we use common-garden data for wild rodents to assess whether species with higher elevational range limits typically have higher thermogenic capacities in comparison to closely related lowland species. Among South American leaf-eared mice (genus Phyllotis), mean thermogenic performance is higher in species with higher elevational range limits, but there is little among-species variation in the magnitude of plasticity in this trait. In the North American rodent genus Peromyscus, highland deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) have greater thermogenic maximal oxygen uptake (

Indexed as

AltitudePeromyscusAnimalsMiceOxygen ConsumptionSpecies SpecificityThermogenesisacclimatizationhigh‐altitude adaptationhypoxiamaximal oxygen uptakePeromyscusphenotypic plasticityPhyllotisthermogenic capacity

Identifiers

PMID37889163
PMCPMC11052920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.