ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2023
Reduction of the scar burden at the donor area of the radial forearm flap with the aid of an endoscopic pedicle preparation.
Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Donor site outcomes and functional recovery are improved with superficial inferior epigastric artery perforator flap compared to radial forearm flap in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- [Accurate repair of oral and maxillofacial soft tissue defects with ulnar artery flap].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe radial forearm flap is one of the most commonly used flaps of reconstructive microsurgery with its long pedicle and thin structure. The donor site at the forearm is a visible anatomic region that has high mobility and functional importance. In this study, a longitudinal and large scar was avoided on the forearm during pedicle dissection of the conventional radial forearm flap with the utilization of an endoscope. Furthermore, arterial, venous, and nervous injuries were avoided by performing a separate inci-sion of 2-3 cm at the cubital fossa to reduce flap failure and donor site morbidity.
methodsThe patients who underwent pedicle dissection of the radial forearm flap with the aid of an endoscope for head-neck reconstruction between 2014 and 2021 were included in this study. The flap was harvested from the subfascial plane. The cephalic vein was used in all of the patients. When the pedicle dissection reached the antecubital region, an incision of 2-3 cm was performed from the skin. Two vein anastomoses were performed for each patient.
resultsThis retrospective study consists of 51 patients. While 45 of the patients were the result of head and neck cancer, six of them had a defect caused by trauma. The average area of skin islands was 40.3 cm2, while the full-thickness skin graft size was 24.2 cm2. An average of 2.6 cm of scar tissue was formed at the antecubital region. No venous or arterial compromise was observed in the post-operative period. There was no partial or total flap loss in any patient. Localized numbness persisted in the skin area where the superficial sensory branch of the radial nerve is located in 6 (11.7%) patients.
conclusionWith endoscopic radial forearm flap harvesting, the longitudinal incision in the forearm and wound healing prob-lems are avoided. The absence of partial or total flap loss has shown that endoscopic harvesting of the radial forearm flap is a safe and reliable method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.