ArticlePhysiological research2023
Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Predictive Testing of Cancer.
Article in Physiological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges and Solutions in Low-Biomass Respiratory Microbiome Profiling: A Workflow for Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Sequencing in Guinea Pigs.Physiological research · 2026Article
- Tumor diagnosis recharacterization enabled by comprehensive genomic profiling to guide precision medicine strategy.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Usefulness of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Clinical Decision-Making in Oncology: A Systematic Review.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2025Review
- Application of comprehensive molecular genetic profiling in precision cancer medicine, Hungarian experiences.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the rapid progress in the field of personalized medicine and the efforts to apply specific treatment strategies to patients based on the presence of pathogenic variants in one, two, or three genes, patient response to the treatment in terms of positive benefit and overall survival remains heterogeneous. However, advances in sequencing and bioinformatics technologies have facilitated the simultaneous examination of somatic variants in tens to thousands of genes in tumor tissue, enabling the determination of personalized management based on the patient's comprehensive genomic profile (CGP). CGP has the potential to enhance clinical decision-making and personalize innovative treatments for individual patients, by providing oncologists with a more comprehensive molecular characterization of tumors. This study aimed to highlight the utility of CGP in routine clinical practice. Here we present three patient cases with various advanced cancer indicated for CGP analysis using a combination of SOPHiA Solid Tumor Solution (STS, 42 genes) for DNA and SOPHiA RNAtarget Oncology Solution (ROS, 45 genes and 17 gene fusions with any random partners) for RNA. We were able to identify actionable genomic alterations in all three cases, thereby presenting valuable information for future management of these patients. This approach has the potential to transform clinical practice and greatly improve patient outcomes in the field of oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.