Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37888817›Full record

ReviewCurrent medicinal chemistry2024

Current Computational Methods for Protein-peptide Complex Structure Prediction.

Chao Yang, Xianjin Xu, Changcheng Xiang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current medicinal chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chao YangDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, New York 10003, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7136-6013
Xianjin XuDalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5011-2997
Changcheng XiangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Aba Teachers University, Aba, Sichuan 623002, China.ORCID 0009-0008-3781-9884

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptide-mediated protein-protein interactions (PPIs) play an important role in various biological processes. The development of peptide-based drugs to modulate PPIs has attracted increasing attention due to the advantages of high specificity and low toxicity. In the development of peptide-based drugs, one of the most important steps is to determine the interaction details between the peptide and the target protein. In addition to experimental methods, recently developed computational methods provide a cost-effective way for studying protein-peptide interactions. In this article, we carefully reviewed recently developed protein-peptide docking methods, which were classified into three groups: template-based docking, template-free docking, and hybrid method. Then, we presented available benchmarking sets and evaluation metrics for assessing protein-peptide docking performance. Furthermore, we discussed the use of molecular dynamics simulations, as well as deep learning approaches in protein-peptide complex prediction.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationPeptidesProteinsComputational BiologyHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingPeptidesProteinsbenchmarking setsdeep learningdocking performance.evaluation metricsmolecular dynamics simulationsProtein-peptide docking

Identifiers

PMID37888817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.