Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37888743›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2023

Head and Neck Cancer Segmentation in FDG PET Images: Performance Comparison of Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformers.

Xiaofan Xiong, Brian J Smith, Stephen A Graves, Michael M Graham, John M Buatti, Reinhard R Beichel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaofan XiongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0692-4522
Brian J SmithDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Stephen A GravesDepartment of Radiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Michael M GrahamDepartment of Radiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6374-4766
John M BuattiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Reinhard R BeichelDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
University of Iowa · USUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · US

Funding

Quantitative Imaging to Assess Response in Cancer Therapy TrialsU01CA140206 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI BUATTI, JOHN M, CASAVANT, THOMAS L. · 2010 to 2019
$5.8M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA140206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have a proven track record in medical image segmentation. Recently, Vision Transformers were introduced and are gaining popularity for many computer vision applications, including object detection, classification, and segmentation. Machine learning algorithms such as CNNs or Transformers are subject to an inductive bias, which can have a significant impact on the performance of machine learning models. This is especially relevant for medical image segmentation applications where limited training data are available, and a model's inductive bias should help it to generalize well. In this work, we quantitatively assess the performance of two CNN-based networks (U-Net and U-Net-CBAM) and three popular Transformer-based segmentation network architectures (UNETR, TransBTS, and VT-UNet) in the context of HNC lesion segmentation in volumetric [F-18] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scans. For performance assessment, 272 FDG PET-CT scans of a clinical trial (ACRIN 6685) were utilized, which includes a total of 650 lesions (primary: 272 and secondary: 378). The image data used are highly diverse and representative for clinical use. For performance analysis, several error metrics were utilized. The achieved Dice coefficient ranged from 0.833 to 0.809 with the best performance being achieved by CNN-based approaches. U-Net-CBAM, which utilizes spatial and channel attention, showed several advantages for smaller lesions compared to the standard U-Net. Furthermore, our results provide some insight regarding the image features relevant for this specific segmentation application. In addition, results highlight the need to utilize primary as well as secondary lesions to derive clinically relevant segmentation performance estimates avoiding biases.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Head and Neck NeoplasmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18CNNFDG PEThead and neck cancersegmentationVision Transformer

Identifiers

PMID37888743
PMCPMC10611182
OpenAlexW4387781586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.