Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37888561›Full record

ReviewVeterinary sciences2023

Emergent Molecular Techniques Applied to the Detection of Porcine Viruses.

Elda A Flores-Contreras, Jorge Alberto Carrasco-González, Daniel C L Linhares, Cesar A Corzo, J Israel Campos-Villalobos, Alexandra Henao-Díaz, Elda M Melchor-Martínez, Hafiz M N Iqbal, Reyna Berenice González-González, Roberto Parra-Saldívar and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Elda A Flores-ContrerasTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey 64849, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1046-6480
Jorge Alberto Carrasco-GonzálezBiosafety, Lomas de los Pinos No. 5505-F, Col. La Estanzuela vieja, Monterrey 64984, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Daniel C L LinharesVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7788-9942
Cesar A CorzoVeterinary Population Medicine Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2749-3496
J Israel Campos-VillalobosProteina Animal S.A. de C.V. (PROAN), San Juan de los Lagos 47000, Jalisco, Mexico.
Alexandra Henao-DíazIndustrias Bachoco, S.A. de C.V., Celaya, Celaya 38010, Guanajuato, Mexico.
Elda M Melchor-MartínezTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey 64849, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5434-2765
Hafiz M N IqbalTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey 64849, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-4855-2720
Reyna Berenice González-GonzálezTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey 64849, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3022-7746
Roberto Parra-SaldívarTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey 64849, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4958-5797
Everardo González-GonzálezTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey 64849, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-6588-5856
Tecnológico de Monterrey · MXIowa State University · USUniversity of Celaya · MXUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular diagnostic tests have evolved very rapidly in the field of human health, especially with the arrival of the recent pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, the animal sector is constantly neglected, even though accurate detection by molecular tools could represent economic advantages by preventing the spread of viruses. In this regard, the swine industry is of great interest. The main viruses that affect the swine industry are described in this review, including African swine fever virus (ASFV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), and porcine circovirus (PCV), which have been effectively detected by different molecular tools in recent times. Here, we describe the rationale of molecular techniques such as multiplex PCR, isothermal methods (LAMP, NASBA, RPA, and PSR) and novel methods such as CRISPR-Cas and microfluidics platforms. Successful molecular diagnostic developments are presented by highlighting their most important findings. Finally, we describe the barriers that hinder the large-scale development of affordable, accessible, rapid, and easy-to-use molecular diagnostic tests. The evolution of diagnostic techniques is critical to prevent the spread of viruses and the development of viral reservoirs in the swine industry that impact the possible development of future pandemics and the world economy.

Indexed as

ASFVLAMPNASBAPCRPCVPEDVPRRSVPSRRPA

Identifiers

PMID37888561
PMCPMC10610968
OpenAlexW4387458349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.