Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37888344›Full record

ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Nanoparticle Dynamics in Composite Hydrogels Exposed to Low-Frequency Focused Ultrasound.

Caroline Einen, Sebastian E N Price, Kim Ulvik, Magnus Aa Gjennestad, Rune Hansen, Signe Kjelstrup, Catharina de Lange Davies

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline EinenPorelab and Department of Physics, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Sebastian E N PricePorelab and Department of Chemistry, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Kim UlvikDepartment of Physics, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Magnus Aa GjennestadPorelab and SINTEF Energy Research, 7034 Trondheim, Norway.
Rune HansenDepartment of Health Research at SINTEF, 7465 Trondheim, Norway.
Signe KjelstrupPorelab and Department of Chemistry, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1235-5709
Catharina de Lange DaviesDepartment of Physics, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSINTEF · NO

Funding

The Research Council of Norway 262644The Research Council of Norway 301581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulsed focused ultrasound (FUS) in combination with microbubbles has been shown to improve delivery and penetration of nanoparticles in tumors. To understand the mechanisms behind this treatment, it is important to evaluate the contribution of FUS without microbubbles on increased nanoparticle penetration and transport in the tumor extracellular matrix (ECM). A composite agarose hydrogel was made to model the porous structure, the acoustic attenuation and the hydraulic conductivity of the tumor ECM. Single-particle tracking was used as a novel method to monitor nanoparticle dynamics in the hydrogel during FUS exposure. FUS exposure at 1 MHz and 1 MPa was performed to detect any increase in nanoparticle diffusion or particle streaming at acoustic parameters relevant for FUS in combination with microbubbles. Results were compared to a model of acoustic streaming. The nanoparticles displayed anomalous diffusion in the hydrogel, and FUS with a duty cycle of 20% increased the nanoparticle diffusion coefficient by 23%. No increase in diffusion was found for lower duty cycles. FUS displaced the hydrogel itself at duty cycles above 10%; however, acoustic streaming was found to be negligible. In conclusion, pulsed FUS alone cannot explain the enhanced penetration of nanoparticles seen when using FUS and microbubbles for nanoparticle delivery, but it could be used as a tool to enhance diffusion of particles in the tumor ECM.

Indexed as

acoustic radiation force (ARF)drug deliveryextracellular matrix (ECM) modelfocused ultrasound (FUS)hydrogelnanoparticlessingle-particle tracking (SPT)

Identifiers

PMID37888344
PMCPMC10606116
OpenAlexW4386995730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.