Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37888337›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2023

A Geometric Feature-Based Algorithm for the Virtual Reading of Closed Historical Manuscripts.

Rosa Brancaccio, Fauzia Albertin, Marco Seracini, Matteo Bettuzzi, Maria Pia Morigi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rosa BrancaccioDepartment of Physics and Astronomy "Augusto Righi", University of Bologna, 6/2, Viale Carlo Berti Pichat, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6240-5586
Fauzia AlbertinNational Institute of Nuclear Physics & Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, CHNet, Division of Bologna, Via Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1983-1464
Marco SeraciniDepartment of Physics and Astronomy "Augusto Righi", University of Bologna, 6/2, Viale Carlo Berti Pichat, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6599-3232
Matteo BettuzziDepartment of Physics and Astronomy "Augusto Righi", University of Bologna, 6/2, Viale Carlo Berti Pichat, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3464-6574
Maria Pia MorigiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy "Augusto Righi", University of Bologna, 6/2, Viale Carlo Berti Pichat, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5697-2325

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray Computed Tomography (CT), a commonly used technique in a wide variety of research fields, nowadays represents a unique and powerful procedure to discover, reveal and preserve a fundamental part of our patrimony: ancient handwritten documents. For modern and well-preserved ones, traditional document scanning systems are suitable for their correct digitization, and, consequently, for their preservation; however, the digitization of ancient, fragile and damaged manuscripts is still a formidable challenge for conservators. The X-ray tomographic approach has already proven its effectiveness in data acquisition, but the algorithmic steps from tomographic images to real page-by-page extraction and reading are still a difficult undertaking. In this work, we propose a new procedure for the segmentation of single pages from the 3D tomographic data of closed historical manuscripts, based on geometric features and flood fill methods. The achieved results prove the capability of the methodology in segmenting the different pages recorded starting from the whole CT acquired volume.

Indexed as

ancient handwritten documentsimage classificationimage segmentationX-ray tomography

Identifiers

PMID37888337
PMCPMC10607176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.