Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37888334›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2023

Mapping Quantitative Observer Metamerism of Displays.

Giorgio Trumpy, Casper Find Andersen, Ivar Farup, Omar Elezabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giorgio TrumpyDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2815 Gjøvik, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9534-0507
Casper Find AndersenDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2815 Gjøvik, Norway.
Ivar FarupDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2815 Gjøvik, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3473-1138
Omar ElezabiDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2815 Gjøvik, Norway.

Funding

The Research Council of Norway 287209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observer metamerism (OM) is the name given to the variability between the color matches that individual observers consider accurate. The standard color imaging approach, which uses color-matching functions of a single representative observer, does not accurately represent every individual observer's perceptual properties. This paper investigates OM in color displays and proposes a quantitative assessment of the OM distribution across the chromaticity diagram. An OM metric is calculated from a database of individual LMS cone fundamentals and the spectral power distributions of the display's primaries. Additionally, a visualization method is suggested to map the distribution of OM across the display's color gamut. Through numerical assessment of OM using two distinct publicly available sets of individual observers' functions, the influence of the selected dataset on the intensity and distribution of OM has been underscored. The case study of digital cinema has been investigated, specifically the transition from xenon-arc to laser projectors. The resulting heatmaps represent the "topography" of OM for both types of projectors. The paper also presents color difference values, showing that achromatic highlights could be particularly prone to disagreements between observers in laser-based cinema theaters. Overall, this study provides valuable resources for display manufacturers and researchers, offering insights into observer metamerism and facilitating the development of improved display technologies.

Indexed as

color reproductiondisplay technologyobserver variabilityvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID37888334
PMCPMC10607170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.