Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37888333›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2023

Placental Vessel Segmentation Using Pix2pix Compared to U-Net.

Anouk van der Schot, Esther Sikkel, Marèll Niekolaas, Marc Spaanderman, Guido de Jong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anouk van der SchotObstetrics & Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2336-6799
Esther SikkelObstetrics & Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marèll NiekolaasObstetrics & Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0002-8170-1249
Marc SpaandermanObstetrics & Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Guido de Jong3D Lab, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8014-0622

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-assisted technologies have made significant progress in fetoscopic laser surgery, including placental vessel segmentation. However, the intra- and inter-procedure variabilities in the state-of-the-art segmentation methods remain a significant hurdle. To address this, we investigated the use of conditional generative adversarial networks (cGANs) for fetoscopic image segmentation and compared their performance with the benchmark U-Net technique for placental vessel segmentation. Two deep-learning models, U-Net and pix2pix (a popular cGAN model), were trained and evaluated using a publicly available dataset and an internal validation set. The overall results showed that the pix2pix model outperformed the U-Net model, with a Dice score of 0.80 [0.70; 0.86] versus 0.75 [0.0.60; 0.84] (

Indexed as

fetal surgeryfetoscopygenerative artificial intelligencetwin-to-twin transfusion syndromevessel segmentation

Identifiers

PMID37888333
PMCPMC10607321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.