ArticleJournal of imaging2023
Evaluating Retinal Disease Diagnosis with an Interpretable Lightweight CNN Model Resistant to Adversarial Attacks.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in medical imaging: a systematic review of techniques, applications, and challenges.BMC medical imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Unveiling the non-linear synergistic effects of smoking and aging on cataract-AMD comorbidity: an explainable artificial intelligence approach.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Editorial on the Special Issue: "Advances in Retinal Image Processing".Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Analyzing Retinal Vessel Morphology in MS Using Interpretable AI on Deep Learning-Segmented IR-SLO Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- OculusNet: Detection of retinal diseases using a tailored web-deployed neural network and saliency maps for explainable AI.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Enhancing Ophthalmic Care: The Transformative Potential of Digital Twins in Healthcare.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is an imperative symptomatic tool empowering the diagnosis of retinal diseases and anomalies. The manual decision towards those anomalies by specialists is the norm, but its labor-intensive nature calls for more proficient strategies. Consequently, the study recommends employing a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for the classification of OCT images derived from the OCT dataset into distinct categories, including Choroidal NeoVascularization (CNV), Diabetic Macular Edema (DME), Drusen, and Normal. The average k-fold (k = 10) training accuracy, test accuracy, validation accuracy, training loss, test loss, and validation loss values of the proposed model are 96.33%, 94.29%, 94.12%, 0.1073, 0.2002, and 0.1927, respectively. Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) is employed to introduce non-random noise aligned with the cost function's data gradient, with varying epsilon values scaling the noise, and the model correctly handles all noise levels below 0.1 epsilon. Explainable AI algorithms: Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) are utilized to provide human interpretable explanations approximating the behaviour of the model within the region of a particular retinal image. Additionally, two supplementary datasets, namely, COVID-19 and Kidney Stone, are assimilated to enhance the model's robustness and versatility, resulting in a level of precision comparable to state-of-the-art methodologies. Incorporating a lightweight CNN model with 983,716 parameters, 2.37×108 floating point operations per second (FLOPs) and leveraging explainable AI strategies, this study contributes to efficient OCT-based diagnosis, underscores its potential in advancing medical diagnostics, and offers assistance in the Internet-of-Medical-Things.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.