Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37888324›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2023

Make It Less Complex: Autoencoder for Speckle Noise Removal-Application to Breast and Lung Ultrasound.

Duarte Oliveira-Saraiva, João Mendes, João Leote, Filipe André Gonzalez, Nuno Garcia, Hugo Alexandre Ferreira, Nuno Matela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. To B or not to B-lines.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Duarte Oliveira-SaraivaInstituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3631-1786
João MendesInstituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5524-2846
João LeoteCritical Care Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta E.P.E, 2805-267 Almada, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9659-8438
Filipe André GonzalezCritical Care Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta E.P.E, 2805-267 Almada, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8539-1092
Nuno GarciaLASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal.
Hugo Alexandre FerreiraInstituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4323-3942
Nuno MatelaInstituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8048-7896

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia Different Grants separated by ";" : FCT- IBEB Strategic Project UIDB/00645/2020; (EXPL/CCI-COM/0656/2021), (UIDP/00408/2020); (UIDB/00408/2020); (DSAIPA/AI/0083/2020); Bolsa de Investigação para Doutoramento 2022.12271.BD); and Bolsa de Investigação para
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) imaging is used in the diagnosis and monitoring of COVID-19 and breast cancer. The presence of Speckle Noise (SN) is a downside to its usage since it decreases lesion conspicuity. Filters can be used to remove SN, but they involve time-consuming computation and parameter tuning. Several researchers have been developing complex Deep Learning (DL) models (150,000-500,000 parameters) for the removal of simulated added SN, without focusing on the real-world application of removing naturally occurring SN from original US images. Here, a simpler (<30,000 parameters) Convolutional Neural Network Autoencoder (CNN-AE) to remove SN from US images of the breast and lung is proposed. In order to do so, simulated SN was added to such US images, considering four different noise levels (σ = 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5). The original US images (N = 1227, breast + lung) were given as targets, while the noised US images served as the input. The Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) and Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) were used to compare the output of the CNN-AE and of the Median and Lee filters with the original US images. The CNN-AE outperformed the use of these classic filters for every noise level. To see how well the model removed naturally occurring SN from the original US images and to test its real-world applicability, a CNN model that differentiates malignant from benign breast lesions was developed. Several inputs were used to train the model (original, CNN-AE denoised, filter denoised, and noised US images). The use of the original US images resulted in the highest Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) and accuracy values, while for sensitivity and negative predicted values, the CNN-AE-denoised US images (for higher σ values) achieved the best results. Our results demonstrate that the application of a simpler DL model for SN removal results in fewer misclassifications of malignant breast lesions in comparison to the use of original US images and the application of the Median filter. This shows that the use of a less-complex model and the focus on clinical practice applicability are relevant and should be considered in future studies.

Indexed as

deep learningSpeckle noiseultrasound

Identifiers

PMID37888324
PMCPMC10607564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.