ArticleJournal of imaging2023
Qualification of the PAVIN Fog and Rain Platform and Its Digital Twin for the Evaluation of a Pedestrian Detector in Fog.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comparative Review of the SWEET Simulator: Theoretical Verification Against Other Simulators.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Vehicles featuring partially automated driving can now be certified within a guaranteed operational design domain. The verification in all kinds of scenarios, including fog, cannot be carried out in real conditions (risks or low occurrence). Simulation tools for adverse weather conditions (e.g., physical, numerical) must be implemented and validated. The aim of this study is, therefore, to verify what criteria need to be met to obtain sufficient data to test AI-based pedestrian detection algorithms. It presents both analyses on real and numerically simulated data. A novel method for the test environment evaluation, based on a reference detection algorithm, was set up. The following parameters are taken into account in this study: weather conditions, pedestrian variety, the distance of pedestrians to the camera, fog uncertainty, the number of frames, and artificial fog vs. numerically simulated fog. Across all examined elements, the disparity between results derived from real and simulated data is less than 10%. The results obtained provide a basis for validating and improving standards dedicated to the testing and approval of autonomous vehicles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.