Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37888318›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2023

Qualification of the PAVIN Fog and Rain Platform and Its Digital Twin for the Evaluation of a Pedestrian Detector in Fog.

Charlotte Segonne, Pierre Duthon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charlotte SegonneIntelligent Transportation System Research Team, Cerema, 63100 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8255-1521
Pierre DuthonIntelligent Transportation System Research Team, Cerema, 63100 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6705-1131
Université Clermont Auvergne · FR

Funding

French Grand Defi on Trustworthy AI for Industry PRISSMA project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vehicles featuring partially automated driving can now be certified within a guaranteed operational design domain. The verification in all kinds of scenarios, including fog, cannot be carried out in real conditions (risks or low occurrence). Simulation tools for adverse weather conditions (e.g., physical, numerical) must be implemented and validated. The aim of this study is, therefore, to verify what criteria need to be met to obtain sufficient data to test AI-based pedestrian detection algorithms. It presents both analyses on real and numerically simulated data. A novel method for the test environment evaluation, based on a reference detection algorithm, was set up. The following parameters are taken into account in this study: weather conditions, pedestrian variety, the distance of pedestrians to the camera, fog uncertainty, the number of frames, and artificial fog vs. numerically simulated fog. Across all examined elements, the disparity between results derived from real and simulated data is less than 10%. The results obtained provide a basis for validating and improving standards dedicated to the testing and approval of autonomous vehicles.

Indexed as

digital twinfogpedestrian detectionsimulation

Identifiers

PMID37888318
PMCPMC10607062
OpenAlexW4387311204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.