ArticleJournal of imaging2023
Advancements in Cataract Detection: The Systematic Development of LeNet-Convolutional Neural Network Models.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Image-Based Deep Learning for Cataract Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Prediction of Cataract Severity Using Slit Lamp Images from a Portable Smartphone Device: A Pilot Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Biomedicine: A Systematic Review from Nanomedicine to Neurology and Hepatology.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- GAN-Enhanced Hybrid Deep Learning with Explainable AI for Automated Cataract Diagnosis.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis and Prognosis Using PET-MRI: A Narrative Review of High-Impact Literature Post-Tauvid Approval.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- GAINSeq: glaucoma pre-symptomatic detection using machine learning models driven by next-generation sequencing data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regular screening and timely treatment play a crucial role in addressing the progression and visual impairment caused by cataracts, the leading cause of blindness in Thailand and many other countries. Despite the potential for prevention and successful treatment, patients often delay seeking medical attention due to the gradual and relatively asymptomatic nature of cataracts. To address this challenge, this research focuses on the identification of cataract abnormalities using image processing techniques and machine learning for preliminary assessment. The LeNet-convolutional neural network (LeNet-CNN) model is employed to train a dataset of digital camera images, and its performance is compared to the support vector machine (SVM) model in categorizing cataract abnormalities. The evaluation demonstrates that the LeNet-CNN model achieves impressive results in the testing phase. It attains an accuracy rate of 96%, exhibiting a sensitivity of 95% for detecting positive cases and a specificity of 96% for accurately identifying negative cases. These outcomes surpass the performance of previous studies in this field. This highlights the accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed approach, particularly the superior performance of LeNet-CNN. By utilizing image processing technology and convolutional neural networks, this research provides an effective tool for initial cataract screening. Patients can independently assess their eye health by capturing self-images, facilitating early intervention and medical consultations. The proposed method holds promise in enhancing the preliminary assessment of cataracts, enabling early detection and timely access to appropriate care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.