ArticleJournal of imaging2023
Method for Assessing the Influence of Phobic Stimuli in Virtual Simulators.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Are you afraid? Neurophysiological responses to multidimensional fear in an interactive semi-immersive environment.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In the organizing of professional training, the assessment of the trainee's reaction and state in stressful situations is of great importance. Phobic reactions are a specific type of stress reaction that, however, is rarely taken into account when developing virtual simulators, and are a risk factor in the workplace. A method for evaluating the impact of various phobic stimuli on the quality of training is considered, which takes into account the time, accuracy, and speed of performing professional tasks, as well as the characteristics of electroencephalograms (the amplitude, power, coherence, Hurst exponent, and degree of interhemispheric asymmetry). To evaluate the impact of phobias during experimental research, participants in the experimental group performed exercises in different environments: under normal conditions and under the influence of acrophobic and arachnophobic stimuli. The participants were divided into subgroups using clustering algorithms and an expert neurologist. After that, a comparison of the subgroup metrics was carried out. The research conducted makes it possible to partially confirm our hypotheses about the negative impact of phobic effects on some participants in the experimental group. The relationship between the reaction to a phobia and the characteristics of brain activity was revealed, and the characteristics of the electroencephalogram signal were considered as the metrics for detecting a phobic reaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.