Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37888298›Full record

ReviewJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2024

A Survey of Publicly Available MRI Datasets for Potential Use in Artificial Intelligence Research.

Katharine A Dishner, Bala McRae-Posani, Arka Bhowmik, Maxine S Jochelson, Andrei Holodny, Katja Pinker, Sarah Eskreis-Winkler, Joseph N Stember

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. AI Applications to Breast MRI: Today and Tomorrow.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katharine A DishnerDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-2764-1411
Bala McRae-PosaniDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0963-7855
Arka BhowmikDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.
Maxine S JochelsonDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.
Andrei HolodnyDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.
Katja PinkerDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2722-7331
Sarah Eskreis-WinklerDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.
Joseph N StemberDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN MORRIS · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
The natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 2005 to 2025
$49.5M
Summer research experiences for medical students supervised by faculty mentorsR25CA020449 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Charlotte Eielson Ariyan · 1985 to 2026
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R25 CA020449NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to bring transformative improvements to the field of radiology; yet, there are barriers to widespread clinical adoption. One of the most important barriers has been access to large, well-annotated, widely representative medical image datasets, which can be used to accurately train AI programs. Creating such datasets requires time and expertise and runs into constraints around data security and interoperability, patient privacy, and appropriate data use. Recognizing these challenges, several institutions have started curating and providing publicly available, high-quality datasets that can be accessed by researchers to advance AI models. The purpose of this work was to review the publicly available MRI datasets that can be used for AI research in radiology. Despite being an emerging field, a simple internet search for open MRI datasets presents an overwhelming number of results. Therefore, we decided to create a survey of the major publicly accessible MRI datasets in different subfields of radiology (brain, body, and musculoskeletal), and list the most important features of value to the AI researcher. To complete this review, we searched for publicly available MRI datasets and assessed them based on several parameters (number of subjects, demographics, area of interest, technical features, and annotations). We reviewed 110 datasets across sub-fields with 1,686,245 subjects in 12 different areas of interest ranging from spine to cardiac. This review is meant to serve as a reference for researchers to help spur advancements in the field of AI for radiology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 6.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiologyBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance Imagingartificial intelligencedatasetsopen-accesspublicradiology

Identifiers

PMID37888298
PMCPMC10873125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.