ReviewJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2024
A Survey of Publicly Available MRI Datasets for Potential Use in Artificial Intelligence Research.
Review in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic value of arterial spin labeling for Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- From Data Poverty to Data Sovereignty: Operationalizing Gold-Standard Biomedical Datasets in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Breast MRI Lesion Classification: A Targeted Evidence Synthesis and Meta-Analysis of Discriminative Performance and Heterogeneity.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- BreastDCEDL: A standardized deep learning-ready breast DCE-MRI dataset of 2,070 patients.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Systematic review of pituitary gland and pituitary adenoma automatic segmentation techniques in magnetic resonance imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Review
- A Structured Review and Quantitative Profiling of Public Brain MRI Datasets for Foundation Model Development.Journal of imaging · 2025Review
- SCOPE-MRI: Bankart Lesion Detection as a Case Study in Data Curation and Deep Learning for Challenging Diagnoses.NPJ artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- AI generated annotations for Breast, Brain, Liver, Lungs, and Prostate cancer collections in the National Cancer Institute Imaging Data Commons.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Article
- Foundation Models in Radiology: What, How, Why, and Why Not.Radiology · 2025Review
- BrainScape: An open-source framework for integrating and preprocessing anatomical MRI datasets.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- AI Applications to Breast MRI: Today and Tomorrow.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to bring transformative improvements to the field of radiology; yet, there are barriers to widespread clinical adoption. One of the most important barriers has been access to large, well-annotated, widely representative medical image datasets, which can be used to accurately train AI programs. Creating such datasets requires time and expertise and runs into constraints around data security and interoperability, patient privacy, and appropriate data use. Recognizing these challenges, several institutions have started curating and providing publicly available, high-quality datasets that can be accessed by researchers to advance AI models. The purpose of this work was to review the publicly available MRI datasets that can be used for AI research in radiology. Despite being an emerging field, a simple internet search for open MRI datasets presents an overwhelming number of results. Therefore, we decided to create a survey of the major publicly accessible MRI datasets in different subfields of radiology (brain, body, and musculoskeletal), and list the most important features of value to the AI researcher. To complete this review, we searched for publicly available MRI datasets and assessed them based on several parameters (number of subjects, demographics, area of interest, technical features, and annotations). We reviewed 110 datasets across sub-fields with 1,686,245 subjects in 12 different areas of interest ranging from spine to cardiac. This review is meant to serve as a reference for researchers to help spur advancements in the field of AI for radiology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.