ArticleMethods and protocols2023
A Simplified Microscopy Technique to Rapidly Characterize Individual Fiber Traits in Cotton.
Article in Methods and protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in phenotyping techniques have substantially improved the ability to mitigate type-II errors typically associated with high variance in phenotyping data sets. In particular, the implementation of automated techniques such as the High-Volume Instrument (HVI) and the Advanced Fiber Information System (AFIS) have significantly enhanced the reproducibility and standardization of various fiber quality measurements in cotton. However, micronaire is not a direct measure of either maturity or fineness, lending to limitations. AFIS only provides a calculated form of fiber diameter, not a direct measure, justifying the need for a visual-based reference method. Obtaining direct measurements of individual fibers through cross-sectional analysis and electron microscopy is a widely accepted standard but is time-consuming and requires the use of hazardous chemicals and specialized equipment. In this study, we present a simplified fiber histology and image acquisition technique that is both rapid and reproducible. We also introduce an automated image analysis program that utilizes machine learning to differentiate good fibers from bad and to subsequently collect critical phenotypic measurements. These methods have the potential to improve the efficiency of cotton fiber phenotyping, allowing for greater precision in unravelling the genetic architecture of critical traits such as fiber diameter, shape, areas of the secondary cell wall/lumen, and others, ultimately leading to larger genetic gains in fiber quality and improvements in cotton.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.