Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37887699›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Knowledge, Perception and Consumption of Indigenous Foods in Gauteng Region, South Africa.

Hema Kesa, Alex D Tchuenchieu Kamgain, Mthokozisi Kwazi Zuma, Xikombiso Mbhenyane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hema KesaFood Evolution Research Laboratory, School of Tourism and Hospitality, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1258-9145
Alex D Tchuenchieu KamgainFood Evolution Research Laboratory, School of Tourism and Hospitality, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2105-5030
Mthokozisi Kwazi ZumaDivision of Human Nutrition, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 8000, South Africa.
Xikombiso MbhenyaneDivision of Human Nutrition, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 8000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0408-9586

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urbanisation in South Africa has led to a nutritional transition from traditional diets (mainly based on indigenous foods) to a Western diet. Currently, the country is one of the most concerned about the prevalence of associated malnutrition and non-communicable diseases. One should, therefore, question the position of indigenous foods (IFs) in the population's eating habits since their nutritional and health value is known. This study aimed to collect updated data on South Africans' true awareness and consumption of indigenous foods, especially in the Gauteng region (the most urbanised province of the country). A quantitative cross-sectional research survey was conducted (n = 746). Among a list of 18 IFs, grain sorghum 32.4% (n = 242), marula 32% (n = 239), pearl millet 21.7% (n = 162), amadumbe 19.3% (n = 144) and cowpea 18.6% (n = 139) were the best known. However, the study noticed a maximum consumption of 19.3% (grain sorghum). Overall, this consumption was seasonal, and its level was significantly defined by race (

Indexed as

DietFeeding BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesDiet, WesternHumansPerceptionSouth Africaconsumptiondiet-related diseasesGauteng Provinceindigenous foodspublic health

Identifiers

PMID37887699
PMCPMC10606043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.