Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37887681›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

The Impact of Culture-, Health- and Nature-Based Engagement on Mitigating the Adverse Effects of Public Health Restrictions on Wellbeing, Social Connectedness and Loneliness during COVID-19: Quantitative Evidence from a Smaller- and Larger-Scale UK Survey.

Linda J M Thomson, Neta Spiro, Aaron Williamon, Helen J Chatterjee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Social-Psychological Consequences of COVID-19: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linda J M ThomsonUCL Arts & Sciences, University College London, London WC1 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9685-3678
Neta SpiroCentre for Performance Science, Royal College of Music, London SW7 2BS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5437-2227
Aaron WilliamonCentre for Performance Science, Royal College of Music, London SW7 2BS, UK.
Helen J ChatterjeeUCL Arts & Sciences, University College London, London WC1 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7943-1580
Royal College of Music · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous UK surveys conducted during COVID-19 examined the pandemic's detrimental effects on health, and the consequences of lockdown and other public health restrictions on mental health. Some surveys considered specific populations and social inequities exacerbated during COVID-19. Fewer surveys examined the ways in which the adverse effects of public health restrictions, such as lockdown, shielding and social distancing, might be alleviated. Drawing upon self-determination theory, the purpose of the current study was to assess whether culture-, health- and nature-based engagement would mitigate the effects of these restrictions on psychological wellbeing, social connectedness and loneliness. Quantitative data from a smaller-scale survey (

Indexed as

COVID-19Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsCommunicable Disease ControlHumansLonelinessPublic HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomCOVID-19lonelinesspublic health restrictionssocial connectednesswellbeing

Identifiers

PMID37887681
PMCPMC10606618
OpenAlexW4387782264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.