Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37887602›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Human Posture Transition-Time Detection Based upon Inertial Measurement Unit and Long Short-Term Memory Neural Networks.

Chun-Ting Kuo, Jun-Ji Lin, Kuo-Kuang Jen, Wei-Li Hsu, Fu-Cheng Wang, Tsu-Chin Tsao, Jia-Yush Yen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chun-Ting KuoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106319, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5783-8141
Jun-Ji LinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106319, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5151-113X
Kuo-Kuang JenMissile and Rocket Research Division, National Chung Shan Institute of Science and Technology, Taoyuan 325204, Taiwan.
Wei-Li HsuSchool and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106319, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4577-140X
Fu-Cheng WangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106319, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5011-7934
Tsu-Chin TsaoMechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Samueli School of Engineering, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Jia-Yush YenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106319, Taiwan.
National Taiwan University · TWNational Chung Shan Institute of Science and Technology · TWNational Taiwan University of Science and Technology · TWSamueli Institute · US

Funding

the National Science and Technology Council, R.O.C 108-2221-E-011 -166 -MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As human-robot interaction becomes more prevalent in industrial and clinical settings, detecting changes in human posture has become increasingly crucial. While recognizing human actions has been extensively studied, the transition between different postures or movements has been largely overlooked. This study explores using two deep-learning methods, the linear Feedforward Neural Network (FNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), to detect changes in human posture among three different movements: standing, walking, and sitting. To explore the possibility of rapid posture-change detection upon human intention, the authors introduced transition stages as distinct features for the identification. During the experiment, the subject wore an inertial measurement unit (IMU) on their right leg to measure joint parameters. The measurement data were used to train the two machine learning networks, and their performances were tested. This study also examined the effect of the sampling rates on the LSTM network. The results indicate that both methods achieved high detection accuracies. Still, the LSTM model outperformed the FNN in terms of speed and accuracy, achieving 91% and 95% accuracy for data sampled at 25 Hz and 100 Hz, respectively. Additionally, the network trained for one test subject was able to detect posture changes in other subjects, demonstrating the feasibility of personalized or generalized deep learning models for detecting human intentions. The accuracies for posture transition time and identification at a sampling rate of 100 Hz were 0.17 s and 94.44%, respectively. In summary, this study achieved some good outcomes and laid a crucial foundation for the engineering application of digital twins, exoskeletons, and human intention control.

Indexed as

deep learningfeedforward neural network (FNN)human activity recognition (HAR)human posture change detectioninertial measurement unit (IMU)internal sensinglong short-term memory (LSTM)

Identifiers

PMID37887602
PMCPMC10604330
OpenAlexW4387251933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.